TOPIC:

SANFL just announced 2000 people allowed at games and will be back on again soon.

WAFL left behing like idiots once again,,,August! what a disgrace

A massive opportunity missed to get a whole new crew along to WAFL with no AFL.

Then there is McGowan who has now allowed two mass gatherings with no enforcement, during a so called State of Emergency...utter BS.

Yet the crowds at WAFL are not allowed over 300.

He should resign.

the WAFC and the club CEO/Presidents have be shown up to be incompetent in all of this.

Stand the Test wrote:

Bazza wrote: SANFL just announced 2000 people allowed at games and will be back on again soon.

WAFL left behing like idiots once again,,,August! what a disgrace

A massive opportunity missed to get a whole new crew along to WAFL with no AFL.

Then there is McGowan who has now allowed two mass gatherings with no enforcement, during a so called State of Emergency...utter BS.

Yet the crowds at WAFL are not allowed over 300.

He should resign.

But Peter the Caped Crusader from subi will be able to sort it all out surely!!

Don’t blame McGowan for not caring about the WARFL., as he calls it, blame the administrators who have not spoken up for us despite, in many cases, bring elected by us to do so.

Not good enough.

AUGUST!!! FMD.

True about the WAFL, they should of been way more on top of this ,,but you cannot have one without the other, MCclown makes the rules, the WAFL go with them, if these idiots in labor had any clue about WA sport and WAFL they would of reached out as a priority to get the thing moving and more importantly Mcgowan should of announced this weekend a total abolition of local restrictions.

Say what you like about about Barnett but he would of been in constant touch with Claremont and WAFL needs through this.

MarkOlsen wrote: the WAFC and the club CEO/Presidents have be shown up to be incompetent in all of this.

Once again, 100% - uselss.,

The SA Premier is SANFL bloke apparently and as you know SANFL as a iconic status in SA..

Then there is WAFL and our bunch of merry men of losers.

MarkOlsen wrote: the WAFC and the club CEO/Presidents have be shown up to be incompetent in all of this.

I won't comment on the other clubs, you certainly hit the nail on the head when referring to Swans Pres.

therealswansman wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: the WAFC and the club CEO/Presidents have be shown up to be incompetent in all of this.

I won't comment on the other clubs, you certainly hit the nail on the head when referring to Swans Pres.

Steve Marshall is a big Norwood fan and has been a member for years, make no mistake getting SANFL back was due a lot to him.

I want the WAFL back on with crowds as much as anyone but the rules have to be consistent. Yes it's inconsistent that he is endorsing the protestors but they have already switched venue's. Hyde Park won't be big enough so they are going to stage their protest at Langley Park.

But also that's no different to going to the shops but no one is against that.

Mark said Bunnings should put the sausage sizzle back on but Bunnings told Mark off because they can't maintain social distancing under the marquee umbrella.

What a strange place we live in today.

DD wrote: I want the WAFL back on with crowds as much as anyone but the rules have to be consistent. Yes it's inconsistent that he is endorsing the protestors but they have already switched venue's. Hyde Park won't be big enough so they are going to stage their protest at Langley Park.

But also that's no different to going to the shops but no one is against that.

Mark said Bunnings should put the sausage sizzle back on but Bunnings told Mark off because they can't maintain social distancing under the marquee umbrella.

What a strange place we live in today.

Yep its all BS now, farcical...

The whole point of shops is its supposed to be essential to buy food etc.. and its not really a mass gathering anyway yes crowded but not in the same way, standing in langley park for 1 0r 2 hrs is literally the same as a WAFL ground , infact its heap more crowded and "dangerous". they will get more than 2000 clowns there.

Im going to email bomb Mc Gowan about this, get 2000 to games ASAP.

Bazza wrote:

DD wrote: I want the WAFL back on with crowds as much as anyone but the rules have to be consistent. Yes it's inconsistent that he is endorsing the protestors but they have already switched venue's. Hyde Park won't be big enough so they are going to stage their protest at Langley Park.

But also that's no different to going to the shops but no one is against that.

Mark said Bunnings should put the sausage sizzle back on but Bunnings told Mark off because they can't maintain social distancing under the marquee umbrella.

What a strange place we live in today.

Yep its all BS now, farcical...

The whole point of shops is its supposed to be essential to buy food etc.. and its not really a mass gathering anyway yes crowded but not in the same way, standing in langley park for 1 0r 2 hrs is literally the same as a WAFL ground , infact its heap more crowded and "dangerous". they will get more than 2000 clowns there.

Im going to email bomb Mc Gowan about this, get 2000 to games ASAP.

Would Swans or Perf get that many normally?

I can't see why anyone on here would have a crack at Peter Capes for saying what we're all thinking. Take aim at the other CEOs for not joining in the call to start the comp asap.