TOPIC:

A wall would be a useful asset on the immigration question, but in all honestly, all he has to do is encourage the state and local authorities to enforce the country's laws; Obama actually discouraged the rule of law on immigration policy, which was unlawaful and an absolute disgrace.

She want be arrested because I don't think the US courts would accept the emails as legally acquirred evidence -- they have all been hacked remember, an offence in itself.

How would it be useful ?
It would keep out the workers whose job is to build it, the American economy is reliant on low paid workers to do the menial jobs from across the border.

Just think Ark if the new President deports the 11 million illegal workers. That will fill one of his polocys as there will be jobs for the African Americans.

true enough, but these workers have been exploitted by the yanks for long enough; you need a controlled boreder to stop people dying when crossing the bloody thing; you need legal entry, plus a reform programme so that the workers are paid some sort of legal wages.

I think Trump's point is you don't need any of those things if there's a bloody great wall and the crossing point determines who enters and who doesn't. can we build a wall across the Timor Sea?

Bc -- we enforce the border through the RAN -- the Americans have not bothererred to control their border for three reasons:

1 the Democrats want Spanish voters
2 the Republicans want cheap labour
3 immorality

I will say it again people die crossing that border, and although most of that responsibility is down to the individual immigrants and their criminal guides, the Americans share responsibility as a wall would be a deterrent against a dangerous journey.

MarkOlsen wrote: Who is going to build the wall Bazza, that is the big question.
Only in America could this happen.

I'm not sure if you've been to the US , but there already is a huge border fence and security along the border, however its continually breached - its not that great a leap to make the barrier more substantial and much harder to pass, a it may not be a wall in the literal sense but it will be a "wall" of greater security to prevent breach.

It comes down to the what administration is really that serious about enforcing it, guess what Obama and Clinton never where, its in the democrats interests to convert cities to Latino ghettos for votes.

Abc radio said the first phone call between PM Turnbull and P elect Trump went well.Trump probably didnt know a lot about Malcom and asked him a lot of questions.Was impressed that Turnbull came from a business background.Dont think Trump likes career polotitions.

Bazza wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: Who is going to build the wall Bazza, that is the big question.
Only in America could this happen.

I'm not sure if you've been to the US , but there already is a huge border fence and security along the border, however its continually breached - its not that great a leap to make the barrier more substantial and much harder to pass, a it may not be a wall in the literal sense but it will be a "wall" of greater security to prevent breach.

It comes down to the what administration is really that serious about enforcing it, guess what Obama and Clinton never where, its in the democrats interests to convert cities to Latino ghettos for votes.

Bazza you do realise that most of the "illegals" flew into America and overstayed their visas. B Obama deported more "illegals" than previous Presidents.

ArkRoyal wrote: Bc -- we enforce the border through the RAN -- the Americans have not bothererred to control their border for three reasons:

1 the Democrats want Spanish voters
2 the Republicans want cheap labour
3 immorality

I will say it again people die crossing that border, and although most of that responsibility is down to the individual immigrants and their criminal guides, the Americans share responsibility as a wall would be a deterrent against a dangerous journey.

AR if their Spanish how can they vote in a US election?