TOPIC:

UNKA2 wrote: Read somewhere it was the lowest tackle count by a team in the GF for a decade

Not that DT points are a defining factor but Hawks had 14 of top 15, Gaff been only Eagle. On disposals Hawks 7 of top 8 Gaff again

UNKA2 wrote: Read somewhere it was the lowest tackle count by a team in the GF for a decade

You're lovin this unk...but then 92 & 94 are very hard to forget for us old blokes hey? Who knows - if history repeats, your bunch of Scott clones may get another go at your masters next year Funny how the vultures who have had little to say while we were winning are suddenly full of voice (or is it shit?). Not only that, but these voices are the ones that "would NEVER follow or watch the AFL". Now, I know you're not hypocrites are you???

58shark wrote:

UNKA2 wrote: Read somewhere it was the lowest tackle count by a team in the GF for a decade

You're lovin this unk...but then 92 & 94 are very hard to forget for us old blokes hey? Who knows - if history repeats, your bunch of Scott clones may get another go at your masters next year Funny how the vultures who have had little to say while we were winning are suddenly full of voice (or is it shit?). Not only that, but these voices are the ones that "would NEVER follow or watch the AFL". Now, I know you're not hypocrites are you???

I am just reporting facts there 58. I have said this year the Eags have played good footy ( and they have). Its the excuses that SOME people are coming up with that shytes me to tears mate. Hawks travelled west twice in three weeks, Eagles would have been fresher, 31 degree weather was supposed also to favour the Eags.

Back to Back to Back. Enough said

BLOODY FANTASTIC RESULT! THEY SAVED THEIR BEST FOR LAST. WHAT A TEAM!

When McGovern put his hand out to help hodge up on the 3 quarter time siren was enough for me to turn it off.. Like why the fck would you help him up!?!?! That just showed me it was boys against men, it's like shaking hands before the bounce.. You just don't Fkn do it!!! Wait till the final siren.. Fck me

Grump wrote: The people who come out with the crap abt trades, players and bottle need to put themselves in the position the WCE found themselves, they played against arguably the best team in 20 years. I think that Hawthorn would beat the lions in the heyday.

It was a very polished, professional and complete game by Hawthorn and we should just acknowledge that without the crap!

Spot on. Freo had their chance against the Hawks & also got belted. Runner up is better than not making the GF.

Leather Stops wrote:

Grump wrote: The people who come out with the crap abt trades, players and bottle need to put themselves in the position the WCE found themselves, they played against arguably the best team in 20 years. I think that Hawthorn would beat the lions in the heyday.

It was a very polished, professional and complete game by Hawthorn and we should just acknowledge that without the crap!

Spot on. Freo had their chance against the Hawks & also got belted. Runner up is better than not making the GF.

Nope makng the GF and losing is worth jack shyte, who cares if ya make it there??

Ohh i reckon Geelong 2007 was the best team in 20 years. 9 AA in that mob. Basically unbeatable. the Hawks have been beatable, BUT thier high level of consistantly winning flags is brilliant and cant e under estimated.

Ahhhh Anchor, you must be talking about the travesty of McGinnity not being allowed to play for EP in the WAFL prelim which completely compromised WCE's preparation hence the no show in the skill and mindsets of so many of his team yesterday. Simpson must be furious

Gotta wonder if a team can recover from a comprehensive smashing like that Anchor....Port's loss to Geelong as an example