Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65
Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC:

Kelmscott Team Nominations Not Accepted 8 years 6 months ago #93078

  • South4eva
  • South4eva's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • Posts: 303
  • Thank you received: 1

The King wrote: Looks like another year where the only A Grade comments are all about people rubbishing Kelmscott. Surely there is someone out there in A Grade who is able to post something else about another club in A Grade. Surely not everyone wants to pick on Kelmscott. Generally most blokes at Kelmscott are pretty good blokes and like most clubs they have 2/3 dickheads no big deal. The club wouldn't be in A Grade if it wasn't well run so put that one to bed. The league is a good side and the reserves are no good again no big deal not the only club with that problem. and they have two good colts teams so someone must be doing something right. It appears that because Kelmscott is the only club from a working class suburb and all the rest of the clubs in A Grade are either college or Uni based or from affluent suburbs all the righteous people from those clubs want to pick on Kelmscott.
Kelmscott have had their problems no doubt no need to keep commenting about them. Hopefully we can get some A Grade input that doesn't involve Kelmscott.


Oh, I intend to comment at least weekly for rest of the season, about the debacle that is kelmsnot...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by South4eva.

Kelmscott Team Nominations Not Accepted 8 years 6 months ago #93746

  • Fair play
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 11
  • Thank you received: 0
You have got to love the underdogs, Go Dogs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Kelmscott Team Nominations Not Accepted 8 years 6 months ago #93762

  • Big Al
  • Big Al's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 166
  • Thank you received: 11
Pretty fair effort by Kelmscott last week. Given North Beach have eight sides in the competition I expected them to win by over 10 goals. As far as I can ascertain as compared to the previous week when TA's gave them a hiding,Kelmscott had only 4 new players in the team and three had played earlier in the year, so no suggestion of "imported players" adding to the team. North Beach were just horrible. Does the coach not have the respect of the players? Surely he must be on borrowed time now.
Is it a case of too many good players chasing premierships in the lower grades or just the curse of the new clubhouse?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Kelmscott Team Nominations Not Accepted 8 years 6 months ago #93779

  • Hawk Eye
  • Hawk Eye's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Dear Leader
  • Posts: 177
  • Thank you received: 24
Saw a the game at Kelmscott a couple of weeks ago. No misbehaviour whatsoever in either match. It seems the players understand what the code of conduct requires from them. I just feel sorry for the Reserves players. Maddington & Kelmscott would seem to be a perfect JV that would give the WAAFL a genuine south suburban A Grade club a shot at the flag and a competitive reserves team.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 297 guests and 6 members online

  • Bazza
  • Demons Forever
  • Viper
  • Time For a Flag
  • one time only
  • Ted Nugent

Newest Footy Recruits

  • JasonObsew
  • Lost WAFL
  • Duncs1977
  • MrBulldog2020
  • MrBulldog