TOPIC:

royallucky wrote:

mikeh wrote:

If you resort to personal abuse on an online forum you have lost the argument.
I have been reading Grumps posts for a number of years and I have always found them fair, balanced and they give credit where credit is due.
If you have an axe to grind with him have the guts to front him personally rather than being a keyboard warrior.

Your not very observant,when we won 5 out 7 he went very quiet,and you name 1 instance when he's praised Barnard,and i first noticed this when we defeated the Falcons in 2019 which was a shock result,but he attempted to downplay with some innocuous comment,so i could see his agenda very early on in the piece,so anybody that knows me knows i have no problem with confrontation,so thank you for your input.

No problem with confrontation so when can I expect you to come to see me, trolls never do and frankly you are just a troll!

Grump wrote:

royallucky wrote:

mikeh wrote:

If you resort to personal abuse on an online forum you have lost the argument.
I have been reading Grumps posts for a number of years and I have always found them fair, balanced and they give credit where credit is due.
If you have an axe to grind with him have the guts to front him personally rather than being a keyboard warrior.

Your not very observant,when we won 5 out 7 he went very quiet,and you name 1 instance when he's praised Barnard,and i first noticed this when we defeated the Falcons in 2019 which was a shock result,but he attempted to downplay with some innocuous comment,so i could see his agenda very early on in the piece,so anybody that knows me knows i have no problem with confrontation,so thank you for your input.

No problem with confrontation so when can I expect you to come to see me, trolls never do and frankly you are just a troll!

I engaged with you in a debate at Claremont oval,about recruiting and injuries in a non threatening manner,and you cowered away in a corner talking to reserves players,probably telling them that they should be playing league football,and you've seen me since,so don't make me laugh.

Why the names,you mentioned the confrontation on the claremont game thread,its there in black and white so no need for personal abuse,i thought you were better than that.

Every club has a white ant or two lurking in the shadows. Pissing in peoples pockets and running agendas. I like to think we all want to see the club survive. 

ROYAL 2019 wrote:

Every club has a white ant or two lurking in the shadows. Pissing in peoples pockets and running agendas. I like to think we all want to see the club survive. 

therein lies the problem Royal 2019, i'm a 50 year supporter and cannot understand how a so called supporter is more predisposed to praising the opposition than his own coach, who is busting his guts restoring the clubs damaged DNA.,and a coach who is a passionate Royal and club legend.

Well I can’t answer that really but I’m sure Grump has done plenty of good things for the club over the years.  Call me a glass half full type. I guess the Barnard issue will be resolved in the next month. Barny seems to be coaching quite well and a bit more positively from my point of view. 

Yes give Grump his due he probably has done positive things,and by all means criticize the coach when he does something wrong,but over the 3 seasons its been constant 1 way criticism and never any praise,and given my association with Barney which goes back 30 years i could only bite my tongue for so long.

Geez RL....bit harsh on Chalmers there mate....the guy has played nearly 100 WAFL games.....all of them practically with EP closest rivals in WP....and you have never heard of him.....life as a WCEP fan obviously played havoc on your eye sight and WAFL knowledge mate....I guess if you didn't attend many games WCEP played, out of protest, then I can see why the name Chalmers is new to you......Schoenfeld is ex GCS and picked up 25 possessions in that EF win over EP back in round 3.....the game Ramsay missed from memory.

Mr Freezin our closest rivals are actually our next door neighbours Subiaco,so i'm not really sure your fully abreast of whats going on,could it be the tyranny of distance????Also when we play west perth i only noticed 3 players in particular so pardon my ignorance.Also i'd like to add that you mentioned we were'' FARKED'' without Ramsay,and on a lot of occasions we are,but we did manage to be beat your arch rivals without him,and can you remember the last time your mob defeated them,as noticed a fortnight ago they gave you another ''DOGGY''

I guess years of that WCE alignment have stripped you bare of any past traditional WAFL vices ...sad that, considering the quality of those past EP v WP clashes......yeah I guess you are right, Subi v EP is a new WAFL derby rivalry now......also agree that when any side plays WP, Nelson, Black and EP boy Keitel are usually the only players opposition fans notice.....without them I reckon WP would be farked.

Live streaming of games does keeps that tyranny of distance to a minimum  fortunately.....on another positive note,  using that  "doggy" analogy of yours, makes me think  EP beating Subi is a given then...especially since EF only beat EP by 2 points after beating Subi by 40 odd points the week before.....here's hoping that Leederville derby is a beauty then, nothing like a bit of derby rivalry to get those traditional WAFL  juices flowing RL.....though my lock down  Kiwi money is on Subi sadly mate, because going off those recent EP v EF games..... no Ramsay, no EP.....perhaps even no Barney come next Monday......