TOPIC:

Senior Seagull wrote: How many former Subi people besides Randy have been commissioners and what are the numbers of reps from other clubs by comparison? I had no idea Subi was so dominant at the WAFC. Must be why we had those draconian recruiting restrictions placed on us!!

Only Randall since 2012 despite nominations from elsewhere. The sames as EP's Fullarton and Kickett and Dorrington going from WAFC employee to Board Member.
There should a maximum consecutive Term Policy.

So what your saying about Subi being over represented is misleading.

Senior Seagull wrote: So what your saying about Subi being over represented is misleading.

I never mentioned over represented.
I said EP & Subi were the only WAFL reps for a long period because the Commission chose who they would put forward to be voted on.

good on him - maybe now there'll be a decent overhaul and some long overdue renewed focus on our state league out of a shake up

therealswansman wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: So what your saying about Subi being over represented is misleading.

I never mentioned over represented.
I said EP & Subi were the only WAFL reps for a long period because the Commission chose who they would put forward to be voted on.

No this actually what you said.
"have been predominantly EP and Subi reps." so who are all these reps your referring to?

Senior Seagull wrote:

therealswansman wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: So what your saying about Subi being over represented is misleading.

I never mentioned over represented.
I said EP & Subi were the only WAFL reps for a long period because the Commission chose who they would put forward to be voted on.

No this actually what you said.
"have been predominantly EP and Subi reps." so who are all these reps your referring to?

Yes predominantly doesn't mean over represented.
It was predominantly EP & Subi , Randall, Kickett, Fullarton from 2012 as they were the only reps.

I don't think there was anything riveting in Ron's "Evidence". Came across as jilted sacked employee at times and the grand standing , like the WAFL CEOs was uncalled for.

Panizza did a much more honest job and seems completely invested in football at all levels and understands the challenges.

It was thought provoking evidence from Ron and also Jeff especially, amongst those who made their submissions.
A couple of clear points that Ron made that seem to have been forgotten by certain people looking only at their own agenda and self interests unsurprisingly!
From the 1986 WCE Prospectus and the reasoning's why WCE were voted by majority into existence by the WAFL Presidents at the time-

a)- To secure the existing WAFL competition and maintain its standard and viability

b)- To maintain the financial stability and the current structure of football in particular keeping the 8 WAFL clubs financially viable

They were the COMMITMENTS made at the time!

BH your right to stress a); how did 6 of them think that taking forty players out of the competition each year would make it stronger?

It's not 1986 anymore.

Care to explain the contents of the Crawford report in relation to the reserves comp?