Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65
Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC:

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25537

  • MarkOlsen
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3137
  • Thank you received: 516
certainly wouldnt want to be in Egypt at the moment

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25538

  • Sacko
  • Sacko's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 501
  • Thank you received: 16

MarkOlsen wrote: how do you know what happened if you were not at the ground ?
do you know if it happened on the field of play ?
was it an umpire or an umpires observer ?

are you Sacko or Judge Judy ?


Hey numnuts, At what stage in any of my posts did I claim to knowing what happened? Have you actually read 1 of my posts? I simply quoted the representative from the WAFC. He said that after they viewed the footage they believe a spectator pushed an umpire and are happy with the way Swans are handling the situation which is they are doing nothing. So the point I made, if you had have read the post, was I doubt very much a spectator did push an umpire because no way in any sport in the world would a spectator get away with that. They would be banned and face criminal charges so I'm actually on Swans side here.

After writing all this I'm hoping you have the physical capability of reading and understanding this post

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25539

  • MarkOlsen
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3137
  • Thank you received: 516
the article actually says umpires advisor and then later on says umpire so maybe since you seem so interested you could contact the WAFC for clarification.

thanks Judge Judy..

out of interest i didnt know that reading and understanding information required physical capability but thanks for your scientific information to go with your legal advice.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25541

  • Sacko
  • Sacko's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 501
  • Thank you received: 16
Yep umpires advisor. Would be exactly the same outcome

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25544

  • MarkOlsen
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3137
  • Thank you received: 516
and was it on the field or off the field ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25545

  • Freezin
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 9693
  • Thank you received: 991

MarkOlsen wrote: certainly wouldnt want to be in Egypt at the moment


how do you know what's going on in Egypt.....you been there of late?.....if you want to spread your wings MO before you are 50 mate I have no doubt BHP could sub you a few dollars for an air ticket for being a loyal SDFC fan......though I reckon a few fella's here would gladly whip the 10 gallon hat round and get you out their tonight first class!! ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25547

  • Sacko
  • Sacko's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 501
  • Thank you received: 16
Don't know don't care. And what difference does it make?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25548

  • Sacko
  • Sacko's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 501
  • Thank you received: 16
I actually couldn't give a f*^k what happened. My question is why is the WAFC, after their own investigation, ok with one of their own being assaulted and happy for nothing to happen? That's why I doubt weather anyone was assaulted

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25549

  • MarkOlsen
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3137
  • Thank you received: 516
for someone who doesnt care you seem to be posting here a lot :)

and where did you read that someone was assaulted ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by MarkOlsen.

Swans vs Peel 11 years 8 months ago #25552

  • OzFooty
  • OzFooty's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 286
  • Thank you received: 165

Freezin wrote: TBH if this had of involved the name of Johhno, the mods would of been over both these boys like the umps are v SD every weekend......need some consistency here mods.....thumbs up or thumbs down?......


I have been keeping an eye on this thread, and thing seem to have diverted somewhat. There has to date been no reports to the moderators.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Beasley Hutton

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 632 guests and 2 members online

  • Success Hill
  • royallucky

Newest Footy Recruits

  • morky12
  • Bassoswan
  • pato
  • Rockwell
  • Ben_AL