TOPIC:

I see there are now politicians are saying if we vote No it will irreparably hurt indigenous people. 
Maybe they should've thought about that before they tried to push this half assed virtue signalling, ineffectual rubbish on normal thinking people, without giving us any idea what it really is.    

Well, it's started. Comrade Cook's totalitarian state is in full swing.  I see a notice in today's paper that submissions are being called for as Gingin Brook is being considered under the ACHA as a place of significance due to a "creative dreaming narrative"which may impact on any future use.

What does that mean I wonder? Because an indigenous person sat on the bank and thought about killing a roo for dinner or had memories of some distant relative there's now going to be restrictions on any future use such as building a jetty or cutting down a dead tree? It's utter madness.

And as for the pm to simply say just vote yes and ' worry about the details later', does not inspire much confidence. 
As we saw with the recent royal commission, govt"s and politicians just bumble along with no regards. 
The voice seems to be ill thought about and indecisive with much confusion from the info I seen.

Two Aboriginal blokes arguing over who should have the right to perform a smoking ceremony at the opening of a fkn freeway extension made national headlines and gave us just a little sample of things to come if we hand the keys over to first nations people. They are just as violent towards each other as they are to white fellas and have been since day dot. That's why state housing had to start getting them all out of Balga, Girraween, Nollamara years ago and spread them out to get them away from one another.

Geoff Parry asks, Rita, what do you make of that? Rita after walking away trying to hide from cameras " It's interesting isn't it?"

Full Uluru Statement held here: www.skynews.com.au/wp-content/uploads/20...-Editorial-PDF-2.pdf

It is an interesting read for those to want to read what the Voice is all about.

Whole thing is a joke.
The voice is the 1st Step towards reparations - which is ultimately their only goal. You really think they care about some words written in a commonwealth document??? All about the cash.

This week in Parl. Chalmers got asked where $900,000.00 has gone in last 12 months out of a $3 million budget on some Treaty indigenous consultation body went and he had no idea.

Apparently the referendum date is going to be the 14th of October. If that's the chosen date, is going to be roughly a 6 week political campaign.

made a difficult decision
grown up with and around many Aboriginal Australians
seen some bloody amazing things in football but also in their remote communities
but not a lot of these folks are wanting this
so until it is far better sorted and for everyone I'll be supplying a no vote

Because they continue to say "Trust us" and refuse to provide sufficient detail on the whole clusterphuck, I'll be voting No. If it was just about recognising First nations people in the constitution, then no probs, but it's the massive beurocratic monster that will be attached to it that is the massive unknown. Albo and Co have made a rod for their own backs by handling this so poorly and it's really insulting to both sides of the question. They are now talking about more funding for the campaign, thats ok as long as taxpayers money is equal for both sides.