TOPIC:

Peter North wrote:

Grassy wrote: No it doesn't.

It doesn't change the Fact we don't want the Bastards in the WAFL!

Why does it matter whether Peel or EP are aligned ,the other elephant in the room is about to romp to another grand final great for the WAFL comp ya clown if you and Swan weren't so obsessed with the AFL you'd see that. anyway keep the going.

PN I have said earlier this year that Subiaco would finish 3-5 games in front of the second team. I also said last year from about halfway through the season that Subiaco wouldn't lose another game. The one they did lose was in the GF against Fremantle.
I have said and I will say it here again that the drop-off in attendances in the last couple of seasons is DIRECTLY related to the host club alignment and the dominance of Subiaco. I have also pointed out that the only reason we have a final five rather than 4 is to provide the illusion that more than one club apart from the three I have already mentioned can make the finals.
Again for your benefit PN I think that the GF will be played between Subiaco and the Fremantle reserves' team. The club that will finish third is the Eagles' reserves' team.
And to continue in the farce that was the survey of the WAFL after last season in my comments I pointed out that there were no questions relating to Subiaco's dominance. Nor were there any questions about the host club alignment.
Finally I am sure there would be more than a couple of Subiaco posters on here that would vouch for y strident criticism of Subiaco's dominance. And i case you think that opinion would be different if it was Swans' I have already responded to Freezin a couple of times that it doesn't matter which club it was including Swans to have one club so dominant over such an extended period.
I hope PN I have sufficiently rebutted your assertion.

Grassy wrote: Don't bother Swan.

You are talking to a Serial Assassin,who clearly doesn't give a Flying Stuff about the WAFL!

As for the other 2,sounds like they're reading a script from WAFC HQ.

Perhaps if the AFL and WAFC dud their bloody jobs properly you 2,as opposed to having their Heads up their Arses,perhaps the Taxpsyer wouldn't have to provide as much funding to Football here,including the AFL Clubs themselves.

Thanks Grassy but I'd rather discuss facts on the topic rather than just listening to opinionated rhetoric with no substance.

What taxpayer funding does WA football, including the AFL clubs, currently receive?

Grassy wrote: And you and your Immoral AFL Buddies keep sticking pins in our Competition.

It's what you do best!

It seems to be the Only Reason you are here!

Not at all. It would be a pretty boring forum if it was only full of the inaccurate shite you dribble constantly.

You really don't need 5000 posts to make your one point over and over again. We get it - you don't like the AFL!

The issue I have is that you are willing to manipulate the truth or even out right lie to try and make your case.

Whether you like it or not, the national game was always going to have a national competition and the WAFL was always going to remain a state based competition and become a second tier level of football.

The challenge for the WAFL is to adapt to this, which it has failed to do over the last 30 years, and become a financially viable competition in its own right. Whilst the WAFC controls the financial lifeline of the WAFL clubs then the clubs will never have control over the competitions governance.

Your incessant ranting to kick the AFL clubs out of the WAFL doesn't actually address the issue. The WAFL clubs have and continue to work in their own self interest despite the rhetoric that they are working together for the good of the competition. At each and every hurdle, clubs have broken ranks that sees the WAFL competition where it is today.

Fair dinkum why don't you blokes start another topic about facilities and funding?

Anyway back to the original topic which seems to be lost. According to this story yesterday in The West, it seems the Eagles are considering going with a stand alone team in the WAFL as soon as next year and release East Perth from the agreement being extended which the WAFC were going to force upon East Perth. This will be great news for the WAFL and great news for East Perth diehards.

thewest.com.au/sport/west-coasts-stand-a...-kelly-ng-b88504979z

DD wrote: Fair dinkum why don't you blokes start another topic about facilities and funding?

Anyway back to the original topic which seems to be lost. According to this story yesterday in The West, it seems the Eagles are considering going with a stand alone team in the WAFL as soon as next year and release East Perth from the agreement being extended which the WAFC were going to force upon East Perth. This will be great news for the WAFL and great news for East Perth diehards.

thewest.com.au/sport/west-coasts-stand-a...-kelly-ng-b88504979z

Sounds like it will only go ahead if East Perth pull out , is that a given?

Bazza wrote:

DD wrote: Fair dinkum why don't you blokes start another topic about facilities and funding?

Anyway back to the original topic which seems to be lost. According to this story yesterday in The West, it seems the Eagles are considering going with a stand alone team in the WAFL as soon as next year and release East Perth from the agreement being extended which the WAFC were going to force upon East Perth. This will be great news for the WAFL and great news for East Perth diehards.

thewest.com.au/sport/west-coasts-stand-a...-kelly-ng-b88504979z

Sounds like it will only go ahead if East Perth pull out , is that a given?

It certainly gives Tom Percy the opportunity to put his case forward to the members and dare say they would grab the opportunity to take back control of East Perth with both hands. Not sure where that would leave Bronte. Maybe he will step down?

Makes for a very interesting EPFC AGM or possible a Special General Meeting might get called.

I'd put money on the alignment remaining for 2018, East Perth making another $300k profit for the war chest and the Eagles going it alone in 2019.

A WCE stand alone side and Freo at Peel should have been the option adopted in 1999.

Fremantle should have to form their own team, anything else gives Peel preferential treatment over the other clubs; not sure why a lot of people on here are closet Peel fans.

ArkRoyal wrote: Fremantle should have to form their own team, anything else gives Peel preferential treatment over the other clubs; not sure why a lot of people on here are closet Peel fans.

This coming from a Subi supporter remind us how many flags and grand finals you're club has been involved in the last thirty years , Peel every day of the week for me in a Peel v Subi GF.

PN: never doubtted your peel prediliction. you go for it.