TOPIC:

What the afl wants the afl gets, we all know that.
Out of interest how are you aware of what our board wants ?
Has the swans board announced this somewhere ?

MarkOlsen wrote: What the afl wants the afl gets, we all know that.
Out of interest how are you aware of what our board wants ?
Has the swans board announced this somewhere ?

Well, its what you want. I'm sure your board will listen.

And no, the powers that be would rather an even colts comp.

But if no even colts comp...the tac cup it will have to be.

Sad but true. Well done for supporting it during this thread

It wasn't too even in 2013 when Swans were last and Subi 3rd, we were embarrassing and I didn't see Subi or any other club offer us a club from their zone to help us out.

Peel are struggling and have the most numbers so the issue is bigger than numbers in zones, that is obvious, how come they are not on top ?

Perhaps the best thing about this thread is that all other clubs supporters can see once and for all how biased, ill-informed, selfish and ignorant some swan Districts supporters are.

They will sacrifice the bigger picture for their own arguement.

I take it in 2013 you offered to help swans colts out when we were last and you were 3rd ?
2 bad years and it's the end of the world ?

MarkOlsen wrote: I take it in 2013 you offered to help swans colts out when we were last and you were 3rd ?
2 bad years and it's the end of the world ?

TAC Cup

You can't answer the question which is disappointing, in 2013 did you offer to help swans colts out when we finished last ?
Yes or no ?

MarkOlsen wrote: You can't answer the question which is disappointing, in 2013 did you offer to help swans colts out when we finished last ?
Yes or no ?

TAC Cup. It's coming. Get ready. A nice even comp. Nice even numbers among the super clubs.

How am I supposed to help a club finish off the bottom when they have great numbers and great talent in their zone?

I guess you'll be saying that if WP somehow fluke some good colts players and finish in the top 3 they are all fine and dandy.

Keep arguing mate.

No other clubs are.

They get it. You don't. It's all about swans with you guys. The bigger picture is lost but nothing is more important than Swan Districts I guess.

Once again I say. If Claremont suporters I';ve spoken to are accepting for the need to change after 26 colts grand finals in 40 years, why on earth are Swans people arguing about Claremont losing one junior club.

And on top of that people at the top of the food chain demanding a TAC Cup if the zones aren't balanced.

Yes, by all means, lets not balance the zones.

Lets make things right for Swans and Mark Olsen and in doing so, lets kick the colts comp into the gutter.

This is a joke from Swans people here isn't it? No supporters can be that selfish surely?

A REPORT ON THE ZONES FROM 2009 MAKES INTERESTING READING.BECAUSE SUBI WAS NOT HAPPY EAST PERTH HAD TO GIVE UP SOME OF IT'S AREA AND LIKE THE DOMINO EFFECT HAD TO TAKE SUBURBS FROM SWANS.I DOUBT ANY CHANGES WILL MAKE ANYBODY HAPPY.

WAFL powerhouse Subiaco and cash-strapped East Fremantle are the big winners from the latest review of the league's zone boundaries in an outcome that has angered several rivals.

The Lions, who have won four of the past six WAFL premierships, have added 10 suburbs to their recruiting area at the expense of East Perth and West Perth under changes unveiled by the WA Football Commission.

Koondoola, Mirrabooka and Marangaroo were among suburbs switched from East Perth's zone to Subiaco, while the Falcons were forced to give up Wangara, Pearsall, Gnangara and Hocking.

East Fremantle also gained a sizeable recruiting patch from South Fremantle and Perth, picking up 10 suburbs on top of parts of Fremantle and Champion Lakes.