TOPIC:

wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

How is WC the devil yet Freo are irrelevant to the success or failure of the WAFL? 

how much does each WAFL club receive from the WAFC per annum? How does the WAFC derive the income that supports these payments? 

A very, very simple question: who owns the WA domiciled AFL licences?

S42 there are several synonyms they you can use instead of constantly repeating domiciled. Also it wasn’t even needed as ‘the WA AFL licences’ was descriptive enough to create understanding by the reader. 

In response to your very very simple question, the WAFC owns the WA AFL licenses. 

A very simple question for you: What is the WAFCs main role? 

The lived experience is they do whatever the WA domiciled AFL teams want most of the time irrespective of how deleterious it is to the WAFL and its clubs viability.

wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

How is WC the devil yet Freo are irrelevant to the success or failure of the WAFL? 

how much does each WAFL club receive from the WAFC per annum? How does the WAFC derive the income that supports these payments? 

A very, very simple question: who owns the WA domiciled AFL licences?

S42 there are several synonyms they you can use instead of constantly repeating domiciled. Also it wasn’t even needed as ‘the WA AFL licences’ was descriptive enough to create understanding by the reader. 

In response to your very very simple question, the WAFC owns the WA AFL licenses. 

A very simple question for you: What is the WAFCs main role? 

The lived experience is they do whatever the WA domiciled AFL teams want most of the time irrespective of how deleterious it is to the WAFL and its clubs viability.

Whilst that might be your opinion, one that you repeat more than ‘domiciled’, it’s not the WAFCs role. 

You might want to think about more than the WAFL when you respond. 

wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

How is WC the devil yet Freo are irrelevant to the success or failure of the WAFL? 

how much does each WAFL club receive from the WAFC per annum? How does the WAFC derive the income that supports these payments? 

A very, very simple question: who owns the WA domiciled AFL licences?

S42 there are several synonyms they you can use instead of constantly repeating domiciled. Also it wasn’t even needed as ‘the WA AFL licences’ was descriptive enough to create understanding by the reader. 

In response to your very very simple question, the WAFC owns the WA AFL licenses. 

A very simple question for you: What is the WAFCs main role? 

The lived experience is they do whatever the WA domiciled AFL teams want most of the time irrespective of how deleterious it is to the WAFL and its clubs viability.

Just because you don't get the answer you want - doesn't mean you are right.

wrote:

Don’t ruin their attempts at being smart arses, Southerner and Swan. You 2 speak the truth. I find it amusing that an East Perth supporter now all of a sudden accuses another club of being tied to WCE. He must forget they have been their bitches several times over the years, at least we still have a home ground. We didn’t sell our soul in East Perth to the highest bidder.

 

so would have perth got a redevelopment without the eagles as a co tennant.sharing sponsorships with them?hungry jacks outlet.yeah your right you don't have anything to do with the eagles.

according to the minister's investigation last year about 9.5 million dollars went anywhere but to WAFL clubs (out of approx. 11 million revenue)

WAFC job is guarantee the second tier comp - the lower leagues or comps were never supposed or going to be highest priorities , excluding junior ones naturally

WAFC and it's clubs who (along with the WA taxpayers) bailed out one failed then-VFL local club are owed far more revenue than is current

won't have a Victorian comp if there isn't any SANFL or WAFL

 

wrote:

according to the minister's investigation last year about 9.5 million dollars went anywhere but to WAFL clubs (out of approx. 11 million revenue)

WAFC job is guarantee the second tier comp - the lower leagues or comps were never supposed or going to be highest priorities , excluding junior ones naturally

WAFC and it's clubs who (along with the WA taxpayers) bailed out one failed then-VFL local club are owed far more revenue than is current

won't have a Victorian comp if there isn't any SANFL or WAFL


 

it’s like an unhealthy roundabout.  Victoria’s AFL won’t survive without the SANFL or WAFL, but I think the reverse would happen as well.

mate the reverse would hurt only victoria - the other states would definitely prosper once more
it's fact 
and they know it

wrote:

according to the minister's investigation last year about 9.5 million dollars went anywhere but to WAFL clubs (out of approx. 11 million revenue)

WAFC job is guarantee the second tier comp - the lower leagues or comps were never supposed or going to be highest priorities , excluding junior ones naturally

WAFC and it's clubs who (along with the WA taxpayers) bailed out one failed then-VFL local club are owed far more revenue than is current

won't have a Victorian comp if there isn't any SANFL or WAFL




 

Not exactly - the WAFL set up Indian Pacific Ltd that went bust, the WAFL was bust as a result of the Eagles going under, the WAFL had a 1 Million loan on Subiaco Oval 2 and 3 tier stands construction at what was then huge interest rates.

The council of WAFL Presidents own that one.

The WAFC was set up to salvage the WAFL and Eagles via a emergency cheap loan funded by Tax payers and the gifting of Subiaco Oval on a 99 years lease for SFA.  

wrote:

wrote:

according to the minister's investigation last year about 9.5 million dollars went anywhere but to WAFL clubs (out of approx. 11 million revenue)

WAFC job is guarantee the second tier comp - the lower leagues or comps were never supposed or going to be highest priorities , excluding junior ones naturally

WAFC and it's clubs who (along with the WA taxpayers) bailed out one failed then-VFL local club are owed far more revenue than is current

won't have a Victorian comp if there isn't any SANFL or WAFL



 

it’s like an unhealthy roundabout.  Victoria’s AFL won’t survive without the SANFL or WAFL, but I think the reverse would happen as well.
 

Not really the entire thing is reliant on AFL funding, Media rights, spnosors and ticket sales take that away and it falls in a heap, there isnt a single other thing in the structure that actually makes money.

 

lets play fantasy football leagues again and pretend all the states go back to their own comps.

It doesnt take long before the best players start drifting to the biggest cashed up comp, and thats always where the biggest population and economy is , being Victoria, which is precisely what happened to the WAFL in the mid to late 80s.