TOPIC:

I think the Wafl matches were lucky to have spectators in attendance last Saturday. Would have been some unhappy Wafl clubs if not. Apparently the Perth glory soccer has banned their enthusiasts from attending their game this coming weekend. Going to be interesting what happens at the Wafl grounds this week

wrote:

I don’t understand how 45k in a stadium is safe, but 55/58k isn’t?  Do they honestly think people there are going to abide by the 1.5m rule?  Just another one of those strange laws.
 

yeah especially when you factor in the trains there and back, WAFL just is not like that.

Looks the the dockers games gone from Optus this weekend, so hopefully WAFL gets a clear local run.

wrote:

How is WC the devil yet Freo are irrelevant to the success or failure of the WAFL? 

how much does each WAFL club receive from the WAFC per annum? How does the WAFC derive the income that supports these payments? 

A very, very simple question: who owns the WA domiciled AFL licences?

wrote:

wrote:

i dont understand. do you mean the ground we’ve been playing at for 60 years or ...no im lost...i have never heard of a ‘west coast stadium’. Should i have?

sorry it must be confusing for you stt..the oval formally known as lathlain oval/eftel oval/brownes stadium i think it might be now called mineral resources oval or maybe it is west coast stadium.

Actually it is Lathlain Park Oval.

Mineral Resources Park is what its called these days, formerly known by several other names, but once was Lathlain.

wrote:

Mineral Resources Park is what its called these days, formerly known by several other names, but once was Lathlain.

Anyone interested should have a look at the back of the stand.

wrote:

wrote:

Mineral Resources Park is what its called these days, formerly known by several other names, but once was Lathlain.

Anyone interested should have a look at the back of the stand.

and then the Council's register of sporting facilities 

Don’t ruin their attempts at being smart arses, Southerner and Swan. You 2 speak the truth. I find it amusing that an East Perth supporter now all of a sudden accuses another club of being tied to WCE. He must forget they have been their bitches several times over the years, at least we still have a home ground. We didn’t sell our soul in East Perth to the highest bidder.
 

wrote:

wrote:

How is WC the devil yet Freo are irrelevant to the success or failure of the WAFL? 

how much does each WAFL club receive from the WAFC per annum? How does the WAFC derive the income that supports these payments? 

A very, very simple question: who owns the WA domiciled AFL licences?

S42 there are several synonyms they you can use instead of constantly repeating domiciled. Also it wasn’t even needed as ‘the WA AFL licences’ was descriptive enough to create understanding by the reader. 

In response to your very very simple question, the WAFC owns the WA AFL licenses. 

A very simple question for you: What is the WAFCs main role? 

Also while you’re at it, answer the second and third questions I previously asked.