TOPIC:

one time only wrote: I'm still trying to work out why some people seem to think that there is a difference between these two now and Barlow & Chambers being hung in Malaysia in 1986.

Same offence, different country, same penalty, different method.

Why don't some people understand Rules?

Theres about 7 kgs difference mate, Barlow and Chmabers only had 1.4 Kg of Smack, these wankers had 8.5 Kg,,,they are a shitload worse.

That's what I'm saying Bazz. These two now have no right to hope for clemency.

it will happen over the weekend, apparently 10 coffins were delivered to the prison island in Bali today,

Purely a tongue in cheek comment here, could they take some of those human rights lawyers with em too. Who pays for those i wonder????
Last night they were on the 7:30 show,calling em "our lads", and "lets bring our boys back home". PUKE!!

premiership hangover wrote: it will happen over the weekend, apparently 10 coffins were delivered to the prison island in Bali today,

Thank Christ for that! Hurry up with it I say!

UNKA2 wrote: Purely a tongue in cheek comment here, could they take some of those human rights lawyers with em too. Who pays for those i wonder????
Last night they were on the 7:30 show,calling em "our lads", and "lets bring our boys back home". PUKE!!

I was wondering the same thing myself UNKA. In fact the total cost of all the appeals and all the people involved over the time it has taken.

Perhaps we should ask the Ayatollah Abbott to pay.

Yeah its a fair law isnt it when that ugly Indonesian prick with all the teeth that helped make the bombs that killed 20 people in Bali in 2005 is let out on parole,he never broke any prison regulations...gee fukn whiz!!!

30plusyeardrought wrote: Yeah its a fair law isnt it when that ugly Indonesian prick with all the teeth that helped make the bombs that killed 20 people in Bali in 2005 is let out on parole,he never broke any prison regulations...gee fukn whiz!!!

Personally ( not saying its right) to compare laws and or decisions. Aparranetly the Indo system deosnt rely on precedents like our system does.

It says carrying drugs is a death penalty, thats LAW in that country. Be it right or wrong thats thier law.

I maintain my stance that the death penalty in most situations is wrong. However, I think that we Westerners trying to tell the Indonesians that they should adopt our stance on it is akin to the crazed muzzos telling us we must adopt their religion.

58shark wrote: I maintain my stance that the death penalty in most situations is wrong. However, I think that we Westerners trying to tell the Indonesians that they should adopt our stance on it is akin to the crazed muzzos telling us we must adopt their religion.

I worry when we agree 58 !!