TOPIC:

Young Keitel has been cleared and is ok to play reserves for West Perth on Monday.

Sanity prevails

Swandog wrote: Sanity prevails

apparently your club voted for him to stay at the royals.

This guy is the most discussed footballer on Ozfooty in the past month or so. Not bad for a bloke who hasn't played a league game yet. Leads me to think that he must be a pretty good prospect despite the derogatory comments of some........

mikeh wrote: This guy is the most discussed footballer on Ozfooty in the past month or so. Not bad for a bloke who hasn't played a league game yet. Leads me to think that he must be a pretty good prospect despite the derogatory comments of some........

He thinks so.Whether he is a good footballer or not isn't the issue.The clubs voted 7 to 2 for him to stay at the royals.The reason is that they don't wan't their colts to be poached before they have a chance to prove themselves.The wafl has to make sure all loopholes are eradicated otherwise it could be a bunfight next year.

Keitel is the WAFL's Tom $cully !!!

chaddy22 wrote:

mikeh wrote: This guy is the most discussed footballer on Ozfooty in the past month or so. Not bad for a bloke who hasn't played a league game yet. Leads me to think that he must be a pretty good prospect despite the derogatory comments of some........

He thinks so.Whether he is a good footballer or not isn't the issue.The clubs voted 7 to 2 for him to stay at the royals.The reason is that they don't wan't their colts to be poached before they have a chance to prove themselves.The wafl has to make sure all loopholes are eradicated otherwise it could be a bunfight next year.

What an intriguing position to take Chaddy22. I accept your assertion that the significant majority of WAFL clubs voted against the move. However, would there have been a significant majority of WAFL clubs opposed to the host club alignment? Surely under those circumstances you will be extremely vocal in your opposition to the host club alignment?

Just made the noose bigger Chaddy...hey Swan42

astro wrote: Just made the noose bigger Chaddy...hey Swan42

Certainly there appeared to be a slight contradiction in stances betwixt and between the two Astro.

swan42 wrote:

chaddy22 wrote:

mikeh wrote: This guy is the most discussed footballer on Ozfooty in the past month or so. Not bad for a bloke who hasn't played a league game yet. Leads me to think that he must be a pretty good prospect despite the derogatory comments of some........

He thinks so.Whether he is a good footballer or not isn't the issue.The clubs voted 7 to 2 for him to stay at the royals.The reason is that they don't wan't their colts to be poached before they have a chance to prove themselves.The wafl has to make sure all loopholes are eradicated otherwise it could be a bunfight next year.

What an intriguing position to take Chaddy22. I accept your assertion that the significant majority of WAFL clubs voted against the move. However, would there have been a significant majority of WAFL clubs opposed to the host club alignment? Surely under those circumstances you will be extremely vocal in your opposition to the host club alignment?

I am not a hyporite like most of the g7 supporters.I am for the two afl clubs having their own teams in the wafl or hopefully a afl reserves comp.Everyone whinges about the eagloes or dockers but they want to have the use of their players both local and eastern staters.i don't want to go back to that system..I will be happy to see all 8 clubs with no afl players.apparently east perth were the only team to vote for the eagles and dockers to have stand alone teams in the wafl.That is where the problem started.