TOPIC:

DG wrote: So when exactly are they going to make a decision on this?

As they say DG, that's the 64 dollar question.

I would have said 64,000 dollar question, but didn't want to over inflate it too much.

Bazza wrote: The Wafl paid the abc for shit ratings and the poor old tax payer picked up the rest, now the tax payer pays nothing, those dollars better spent on health and education.

Bazza check out the attendance (i.e. those who ACTUALLY turn up at a footy oval) tomorrow at Freo Oval tomorrow. By any metric our attendances at the WAFL this year have been abysmal and the indication that 2017 will be even worse. AND NO I am not talking about Swans' attendances; I am talking about the entire WAFL attendances.

westaussieguy wrote: I would have said 64,000 dollar question, but didn't want to over inflate it too much.

Yes it's a joke wag. Everyone knows exactly when the afl granny is on but it's ok to let the punters know the schedule for the wafl gf 5 minutes before bounce down...farrrkn disgrace!

The original article implied that the WAFC were going to wait to see where West Coast finished on the ladder before making a decision as they did not want to risk the game clashing with an Eagles final. If this is the case we can expect a decision in about 2 weeks at the end of the AFL qualifying round.

I reckon they will wait until they know who is playing and likely crowd that would attend - WP v EP night final 25k plus, WP v SF night final 20-25k, Peel v $ubi day final 10-15k etc etc

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: The Wafl paid the abc for shit ratings and the poor old tax payer picked up the rest, now the tax payer pays nothing, those dollars better spent on health and education.

Bazza check out the attendance (i.e. those who ACTUALLY turn up at a footy oval) tomorrow at Freo Oval tomorrow. By any metric our attendances at the WAFL this year have been abysmal and the indication that 2017 will be even worse. AND NO I am not talking about Swans' attendances; I am talking about the entire WAFL attendances.

That was the smallest SDFC turnout I have ever seen at Freo, piss poor.

Bazza wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: The Wafl paid the abc for shit ratings and the poor old tax payer picked up the rest, now the tax payer pays nothing, those dollars better spent on health and education.

Bazza check out the attendance (i.e. those who ACTUALLY turn up at a footy oval) tomorrow at Freo Oval tomorrow. By any metric our attendances at the WAFL this year have been abysmal and the indication that 2017 will be even worse. AND NO I am not talking about Swans' attendances; I am talking about the entire WAFL attendances.

That was the smallest SDFC turnout I have ever seen at Freo, piss poor.

Bazza what an absolute joke. We are three games behind the second last team. Souths are second. Where were your supporters because they certainly weren't at Freo Oval on Saturday. And as for the mythical attendance figure of 1,722 . . .

Still got one more chance for sffc fans to get out there before the Old Latho goes and the dozers move in.

When is the redevelopment starting?

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: The Wafl paid the abc for shit ratings and the poor old tax payer picked up the rest, now the tax payer pays nothing, those dollars better spent on health and education.

Bazza check out the attendance (i.e. those who ACTUALLY turn up at a footy oval) tomorrow at Freo Oval tomorrow. By any metric our attendances at the WAFL this year have been abysmal and the indication that 2017 will be even worse. AND NO I am not talking about Swans' attendances; I am talking about the entire WAFL attendances.

That was the smallest SDFC turnout I have ever seen at Freo, piss poor.

Bazza what an absolute joke. We are three games behind the second last team. Souths are second. Where were your supporters because they certainly weren't at Freo Oval on Saturday. And as for the mythical attendance figure of 1,722 . . .

He more than likely wasnt even there again 42 like the previous games vs SD that he reckons he attended!