TOPIC:

MarkOlsen wrote: hey BH, how great is it going to be when this site closes and this bloke can spend even more time on the Swans facebook page

Yeah great MO tho the admins know all about him after his puerile efforts earlier!

Beasley Hutton wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: hey BH, how great is it going to be when this site closes and this bloke can spend even more time on the Swans facebook page

Yeah great MO tho the admins know all about him after his puerile efforts earlier!

Why bother having a Facebook page when you have bugger all supporters.

why bother having a facebook page when you have bugger all friends ?
these are the questions that we should be debating in the lead up the the US election along with the wall between the US and Mexico.

MarkOlsen wrote: why bother having a facebook page when you have bugger all friends ?
these are the questions that we should be debating in the lead up the the US election along with the wall between the US and Mexico.

Great banter mate, I'm really going to miss our interactions if this site does shut down. Don't ever take any of this to heart and feel you need to get personal, we're all just passionate WAFL supporters.

Theouterseagull wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: hey BH, how great is it going to be when this site closes and this bloke can spend even more time on the Swans facebook page

Yeah great MO tho the admins know all about him after his puerile efforts earlier!

Why bother having a Facebook page when you have bugger all supporters.

Oh really, I just had a quick squiz over at FB seeing as tho you brought it up to see who actually follows each WAFL clubs page by way of likes and it makes for interesting reading as follows in order from 1st to last-

SD- 19, 468
EF- 7, 973
EP- 7, 558
SF- 5, 887
PT- 5, 185
$U- 5, 095
WP- 5, 015
CL- 3, 939
PE- 3, 604

WAFL- 17, 677

So much for not bothering with a FB page if you have bugger all supporters especially those that have less followers than Peel

no wonder he comes over to the Swans one, needs someone to talk to..

Beasley Hutton wrote:

Theouterseagull wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: hey BH, how great is it going to be when this site closes and this bloke can spend even more time on the Swans facebook page

Yeah great MO tho the admins know all about him after his puerile efforts earlier!

Why bother having a Facebook page when you have bugger all supporters.

Oh really, I just had a quick squiz over at FB seeing as tho you brought it up to see who actually follows each WAFL clubs page by way of likes and it makes for interesting reading as follows in order from 1st to last-

SD- 19, 468
EF- 7, 973
EP- 7, 558
SF- 5, 887
PT- 5, 185
$U- 5, 095
WP- 5, 015
CL- 3, 939
PE- 3, 604

WAFL- 17, 677

So much for not bothering with a FB page if you have bugger all supporters especially those that have less followers than Peel

Wow those are fantastic figures, it's a shame a majority of those 19,000 never show up to games. Being the only paid advertised WAFL FB page has certainly seen results, perhaps other WAFL clubs should consider paying FB to push their page through advertising.

Paid advert that's a new one ...is that the same as including 6000 crowd figures for which no one even paid at the gate?

Exciting times down at Swans, not only have they won the biggest quarter time huddle contest, they also have the most Facebook likes. What a time to be a DuckHead

I also have it on good authority that Swans home ground has more blades of grass per square metre than any other WAFL ground.