TOPIC:

Virtually nothing positive written or broadcasted about the WAFL, very sad.

thats what happens when the WAFC/WAFL fail to work and engage with the majority of the WAFL clubs and treat 2 clubs favourably, it means the others will use any means possible to fight back.

any chance the WAFC/WAFL can let us know why Peel dont have to pay their debts back or why EP/Peel need such big lists of players ?

Yeah Mark I definitely want to know why Mandurah were allowed to get out of paying back debts owed last year , and then made announcement that they were back in the black accounting-wise ?????

Mandurah Dockers , shockers should of paid all their debts.

↑ Perhaps the advertising should be saying this.
Don't be surprised about old bob, there Bazza. Not really shocked to hear he poo poo-ed the idea. That pr is past it's use by date, that's for sure.

Cardy wrote:

Southerner wrote: I stated that the major telecaster cannot just sponsor one club when all clubs are paying for the coverage - that's basically taking from all clubs then giving it back to one
Do you actually understand that conflict of obvious interest or are you just ignoring the obvious

Agree Southerner.. Conflict of interest obviously. As I Stated on WP site.. as far as I am concerned 7 got the telecast even though 9 tried because 7 are sponsors of EPFC..
The club who are the bitch of the AFL along with the WAFC. Simple as that and I hope Channel 9 and the Sunday Times who have come out of the AFL mold to actually sponser a WAFL club in WP.. Something is in the wind and it could be a lovely war as it will give people an idea of what is actually happening to the the DEMISE of the WAFL if it hasnt already happened with the Alignment bullsit... Shit EP from running at a loss for years to a $380,000 profit last year when they dont seem to have many fund raising events like the other Battlers do in the WAFL.... IT FARKING STINKS

You have got to be kidding Cardy , ch7 got the broadcasting rights because of East Perth ? I know you hate East Perth and the alignment , but lets keep things in perspective .
And Im pretty sure East Perth have made profits for at least the past 5 years or more .

C7 sponsoring one club ie EPFC is not a bad thiing but would be better if they sponsored all clubs or alternatively allow 9 and 10 if they wish to get involved.
This is not North Korea

MarkOlsen wrote: thats what happens when the WAFC/WAFL fail to work and engage with the majority of the WAFL clubs and treat 2 clubs favourably, it means the others will use any means possible to fight back.

any chance the WAFC/WAFL can let us know why Peel dont have to pay their debts back or why EP/Peel need such big lists of players ?

Maybe because 22-24 players will be with the eagles or peel every week Daa.Already two eagles gone for the year and clogging up our list.

maybe EP could promote their colts to reserves during the year like other clubs and they wont want to look elsewhere at the end of the year.
then they wouldnt need such big lists.