-
BC
-
-
Offline
-
Platinum Member
-
-
Posts: 9312
-
Thank you received: 1674
-
-
|
Grassy wrote:
BC wrote:
swan42 wrote:
Bazza wrote:
BC wrote: yep agree...the place is third world when you look at what's been done and compare it to other cities. for mine it's not enough to just have new hospitals at FSH, Midland, the kids hospital, airport access at Leach Hwy and city gateway at the causeway, new sports stadium, Elizabeth Quay, reinvigoration of Northbridge precinct, new schools and infrastructure...chit...according to some on here this government has been a abject failure because it hasn't built the Ellenbrook light rail and I couldn't agree more !!!! 
Yep true , that is largely it, tbh more has been achieved in 8 years than in the previous 20 as far as the city goes, the change has been massive, just look at the umm and ahhing over the stadium that's gone on for 20 or 30 years of dithering , I dont reckon labour would of ever built one and if it had it would of been another half arse effort in subi.. E Q will be a massive benefit to the City long term - the Ellenbrook railway pfft, PTA where quite clear the figures just don't warrant it, and we get something far more useful a link to the airport which everyone in the state can benefit from.
Bazza where does one start?
Good to see you apologising for the incompetence of Emperor Barnett's government.
Let's start at the new stadium. When Langoulant, by no means a stooge of the ALP, did the initial investigation the report indicated that the footings for a stadium at its current location was going to cost an additional $200 million. One could reasonably expect that the cost in today's terms would be north of $300 million.
Now Betty's Jetty:an outstanding success if your aim wasto make kids sick with the water feature.
The new children's hospital I am by no means a monarchist nut why would Emperor Barnett want to trash the worldwide reputation of PMH? Perhaps you can also explain how lead in the water supply,as reported in the press, is an advantage.
Ellenbrook rail link WAS PROMISED TWICE by Emperor Barnett and a rapid bus transit system.How many seats around Ellenbrook do you reckon Emperor Barnett's party will get in the election next March Bazza?
The Perth airport rail link: probably the least required rail link required to cater for Perth's growing population. One can speculate as to why it extends to Forrestfield. Similarly, how close will the stations be to the proposed new terminal at Perth Airport Also, please explain how someone living in Fremantle is going to be able to get to the airport BY TRAIN, for a 6.00 am flight?
How does a government lose its triple A credit ranking during a mining boom?
I could go on and on providing further evidence of the incompetence of the Emperor Barnett's government
The ONLY CHANCE Perth has of getting a decent rail network to cater for the projectedincrease in Perth's population is for us to elect an ALP government next March.
every point you've raised 42 is trivial nonsense. the water park at betty's jetty, lead in the water at the kids hospital, footings for the stadium...big deal...each and every one is fixable. the perth airport link...we're probably the only major city in the world without one ...and if you don't think we're large enough for a rail link then just reflect for a moment there are only 4 cities in the US bigger than Perth based on 2015 data....go figure. so I take it the 42 family won't be availing themselves of any or all of the above out of protest? Christ 42...reading your posts makes a sane person want to commit suicide you're so negative.
Trivial?Big Deal?
That's the sort of Attitude that would land Government's of any persuasion in trouble with it's Electorate.We understand how Governments are keen to launch their Big Budget(and babies)Projects with much fanfare and Self Congratulations.
But to do it,when the darn things aren't ready yet and put Public Health and Safety at Risk,is Unacceptable and the closure of that contaminated Fountain for Several Months was a very quiet admission,the Barnett Government knew it Blundered Big Time on this.
It is Far from Trivial nonsense,as you'd know,if the Boot was on the other foot,the Conservatives here,would be screaming Blue Murder about it,far louder than Church Mouse Mark could ever squeak up.
Where did you get those population figures?Are you talking CBD's or Metropolitan Population figures,because we are dealing with Perth in it's entirity,not the CBD,when it comes to Public Transport.
Plenty of Larger US Cities than us,with bigger Metropolitan Populations,such as New York,Chicago,LA,Dallas,Miami,Detroit,Pittsburgh,etc.That's 7 to start with.
google it and you'll find the stats on Wikipedia grassy. It uses the Greater Capital City Stat Area which is the one favoured by ABS.
In 2015 US had
NY (8.5m)
LA (4.0)
Chicago (2.7)
Houston (2.3)
Phillie (1.5)
Aust had
Sydney (5.0)
Melb (4.5)
Bris (2.3)
Perth (2.0)
|