TOPIC:

58shark wrote:

DG wrote: I actually liked gremar the harmless psycho he was good value

I liked gremar in his first coming. Unfortunately in his second coming, he reverted to abuse and bad language - he sunk his own ship.

Didnt last and tbh was probably not the reason why this site got cooked, the prime offenders have been couple of sdfc idiots as mentioned above by BC and Co.

Bazza wrote:

58shark wrote:

DG wrote: I actually liked gremar the harmless psycho he was good value

I liked gremar in his first coming. Unfortunately in his second coming, he reverted to abuse and bad language - he sunk his own ship.

Didnt last and tbh was probably not the reason why this site got cooked, the prime offenders have been couple of sdfc idiots as mentioned above by BC and Co.

Lol you would be right up there.

Bloody hell you blokes get over yourselves.. Bitchin & whinging like old moles.. The banter has been going on for years! If the site folds so be it 20,000 people won't wake up tomorrow & your crying that someone says something bad about you or your club.. FMD.. Stop sucking each other's dicks & get real.

Peter North wrote:

Bazza wrote:

58shark wrote:

DG wrote: I actually liked gremar the harmless psycho he was good value

I liked gremar in his first coming. Unfortunately in his second coming, he reverted to abuse and bad language - he sunk his own ship.

Didnt last and tbh was probably not the reason why this site got cooked, the prime offenders have been couple of sdfc idiots as mentioned above by BC and Co.

Lol you would be right up there.

Clouseau really doesn't have a clue PN

Peter North wrote:

Bazza wrote:

58shark wrote:

DG wrote: I actually liked gremar the harmless psycho he was good value

I liked gremar in his first coming. Unfortunately in his second coming, he reverted to abuse and bad language - he sunk his own ship.

Didnt last and tbh was probably not the reason why this site got cooked, the prime offenders have been couple of sdfc idiots as mentioned above by BC and Co.

Lol you would be right up there.

Very much doubt it, The idiotic behaviour of people disclosing personal information on a forum is something I have never done.

Bazza wrote:

Peter North wrote:

Bazza wrote:

58shark wrote:

DG wrote: I actually liked gremar the harmless psycho he was good value

I liked gremar in his first coming. Unfortunately in his second coming, he reverted to abuse and bad language - he sunk his own ship.

Didnt last and tbh was probably not the reason why this site got cooked, the prime offenders have been couple of sdfc idiots as mentioned above by BC and Co.

Lol you would be right up there.

Very much doubt it, The idiotic behaviour of people disclosing personal information on a forum is something I have never done.

What about that someone from Wembley.

Beasley Hutton wrote:

Peter North wrote:

Bazza wrote:

58shark wrote:

DG wrote: I actually liked gremar the harmless psycho he was good value

I liked gremar in his first coming. Unfortunately in his second coming, he reverted to abuse and bad language - he sunk his own ship.

Didnt last and tbh was probably not the reason why this site got cooked, the prime offenders have been couple of sdfc idiots as mentioned above by BC and Co.

Lol you would be right up there.

Clouseau really doesn't have a clue PN

So tell me BH on what basis did you have permission to stalk me on the web? then to disclose what you purported to be my name on this blog site, that is of course you have not mistakenly Id me and defamed another , in which case you would be committing identity theft, further on what basis and with what permission did you or swandog have to start sharing via electronic means information purporting to be my name to persons or persons unknown to me? Do you know how idiotic it is to disclose identification in cyber space to third parties? How this could be classed as cyber stalking? A breach of Privacy Laws, and a blatantly stupid act because if something went wrong this site could of face legal consequences? do you take any responsibility for those actions? And , any reprocussions that may occur now or down the track even after this site closes? If you have no issue with any of this feel free to PM me with your name and if swandog is reading he can do the same, no doubt having wantly disclosed the id of bloggers on this site completely against their wishes, you will have no problem doing the same for yourself to me of course by your own consent. Then if you decide not to , it will clearly illustrate the point I am making. As some elsewhere said above simpletons like you have no idea how serious certain behaviour can be in cyber space. It is in deed unfortunate that as pointed out by others above albeit in relation to other issues ( which I agree with also) that you and a cohort swans people have caused terminal issues to this site.

What are you on about Clouseau? You are the one who named Grassy on this forum the other day have a look in the mirror champ!

Beasley Hutton wrote: What are you on about Clouseau? You are the one who named Grassy on this forum the other day have a look in the mirror champ!

Guessed it coward, and idiot, no PM with your name.

Bazza wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

Peter North wrote:

Bazza wrote:

58shark wrote:

DG wrote: I actually liked gremar the harmless psycho he was good value

I liked gremar in his first coming. Unfortunately in his second coming, he reverted to abuse and bad language - he sunk his own ship.

Didnt last and tbh was probably not the reason why this site got cooked, the prime offenders have been couple of sdfc idiots as mentioned above by BC and Co.

Lol you would be right up there.

Clouseau really doesn't have a clue PN

So tell me BH on what basis did you have permission to stalk me on the web? then to disclose what you purported to be my name on this blog site, that is of course you have not mistakenly Id me and defamed another , in which case you would be committing identity theft, further on what basis and with what permission did you or swandog have to start sharing via electronic means information purporting to be my name to persons or persons unknown to me? Do you know how idiotic it is to disclose identification in cyber space to third parties? How this could be classed as cyber stalking? A breach of Privacy Laws, and a blatantly stupid act because if something went wrong this site could of face legal consequences? do you take any responsibility for those actions? And , any reprocussions that may occur now or down the track even after this site closes? If you have no issue with any of this feel free to PM me with your name and if swandog is reading he can do the same, no doubt having wantly disclosed the id of bloggers on this site completely against their wishes, you will have no problem doing the same for yourself to me of course by your own consent. Then if you decide not to , it will clearly illustrate the point I am making. As some elsewhere said above simpletons like you have no idea how serious certain behaviour can be in cyber space. It is in deed unfortunate that as pointed out by others above albeit in relation to other issues ( which I agree with also) that you and a cohort swans people have caused terminal issues to this site.

He did it to you too?