TOPIC:

not when its supposed to be funding $1.9 billion in handouts...

po.cocko wrote: $126 million better than a kick in the arse mate.

...but not quite 2 BILLION.."only" 1874 Million SHORT...!!!

UNKA2 wrote:

po.cocko wrote: $126 million better than a kick in the arse mate.

...but not quite 2 BILLION.."only" 1874 Million SHORT...!!!

'that' asteroid that is heading our way is only going to miss us by +- 27000k's....that's closer than their $126m

Im sick of hearing about surpluses and deficits!! I couldnt give a rats arse if we had either as it will make ZERO difference to the average person! And ill tell you most average people out there couldnt give a shit either..I would rather things get done like infrastructure etc and be in debt Federally or locally like Labour delivers than Liberal Govts Fed and Locally who rack up the savings a give little, or in Barnetts case use the $ to build unnecessary monuments to himself

Swandog wrote: Im sick of hearing about surpluses and deficits!! I couldnt give a rats arse if we had either as it will make ZERO difference to the average person! And ill tell you most average people out there couldnt give a shit either..I would rather things get done like infrastructure etc and be in debt Federally or locally like Labour delivers than Liberal Govts Fed and Locally who rack up the savings a give little, or in Barnetts case use the $ to build unnecessary monuments to himself

Ahh yes ignorance is BLISS...bit like a mastercard mentatilty....rack one up to the max, then get another one!!.... ALAS, once the credit runs out... its still gotta be paid back. Tell that too the Greek and SPanish people with 20% plus unemployment and the country effectievely BROKE. There is always a cost.

10% of something is better than 100% of fark all!

po.cocko wrote: 10% of something is better than 100% of fark all!

Its not even 10% ( by a long way)....and it cost 50 milllion to set up!!

PM Gillard's western Sydney experiment has been declared a political disaster by voters with the Prime Minister failing to convince them she would govern in their interests.
In the first poll of Ms Gillard's five-day sleepover at Rooty Hill last week, 41 per cent of people now believe Tony Abbott would do more to help residents of Sydney's west compared to just 32 per cent for the PM.
The results confirm Labor strategists' fears, that the mini-campaign may have done more harm than good despite a host of policy announcements, as sources revealed that Ms Gillard was bracing for a potential move on her leadership this coming week.
Talk of a move against Ms Gillard escalated last night in the wake of the disastrous Western Australia state election result. The talk was started by WA's Alannah MacTiernan. And now key backers of Kevin Rudd are arguing that she needed to be replaced to rescue the ALP nationally.

If i was K.Rudd I would let the bitch take the pounding she's got coming to her. No way could Rudd turn things around so why would he want to lead Labor to defeat? There would be a bit of poetic justice for Rudd I would imagine seeing her get hammered at the polls.

Johnno wrote: If i was K.Rudd I would let the bitch take the pounding she's got coming to her. No way could Rudd turn things around so why would he want to lead Labor to defeat? There would be a bit of poetic justice for Rudd I would imagine seeing her get hammered at the polls.

Agree Johnno. Looks like she has lost support from everyone and every gropu, be they women or traditional blue collar blokes. Reckon Steven Smith comes across as relatively ok.