TOPIC:

Perth will coming out of this looking like amateurs. That’s a guarantee.

DD wrote:

KCEF wrote: Maybe they were trying to keep it out of Arbitration in the best interest of the player?? Sounds like Leggett is going to have to tip the bucket

It's hilarious you blokes think Leggett has dirt to tip on the PFC. Goes to show how desperate you are getting.

EFFC desperate? Pot kettle black

KCEF wrote: Perth will coming out of this looking like amateurs. That’s a guarantee.

Now what could be more amateurish than a club that sets up a contracted required player from a rival club in a rental on the clubs doorstep and making all sorts of promises knowing full well he is ineligible for a clearance and heresay from a disgruntled player is filtered down to supporters who jump on this forum bleeting about it.

It's blatantly obvious who are the true amateurs here and who are the desperate ones.

DD wrote:

KCEF wrote: Perth will coming out of this looking like amateurs. That’s a guarantee.

Now what could be more amateurish than a club that sets up a contracted required player from a rival club in a rental on the clubs doorstep and making all sorts of promises knowing full well he is ineligible for a clearance and heresay from a, disgruntled player is filtered down to supporters who jump on this forum bleeting about it.

It's blatantly obvious who are the true amateurs here.

Wow did any of that actually happen?

Ti Em wrote:

DD wrote:

KCEF wrote: Perth will coming out of this looking like amateurs. That’s a guarantee.

Now what could be more amateurish than a club that sets up a contracted required player from a rival club in a rental on the clubs doorstep and making all sorts of promises knowing full well he is ineligible for a clearance and heresay from a, disgruntled player is filtered down to supporters who jump on this forum bleeting about it.

It's blatantly obvious who are the true amateurs here.

Wow did any of that actually happen?

Well you will look pretty silly if it didn't, or should I say even sillier?

Another thing that should be considered is that the WAFL increased EF points to 125 and reduced ours to 110. That makes it easy for EF to get a 7 point player on top of the four 10 pointers they already have. It makes it hard for Perth to replace a quality 1 pointer. The WAFL can hardly have any integrity if it reduces our points, encourages us to go local, then approves the transfer of one of our best contracted players to a rival club.

DD wrote:

Ti Em wrote:

DD wrote:

KCEF wrote: Perth will coming out of this looking like amateurs. That’s a guarantee.

Now what could be more amateurish than a club that sets up a contracted required player from a rival club in a rental on the clubs doorstep and making all sorts of promises knowing full well he is ineligible for a clearance and heresay from a, disgruntled player is filtered down to supporters who jump on this forum bleeting about it.

It's blatantly obvious who are the true amateurs here.

Wow did any of that actually happen?

Well you will look pretty silly if it didn't, or should I say even sillier?

i am sure that makes sense to you DD. I will confess i have a not clue as to what you are on about. i'm just going along with the coach and the line that it is between Mineral Resources and the player. Whatever will be will be. Our season does not hinge on this or any one player - but you guys face ruin if he goes apparently. This would explain why you are so desperately trying to keep a player who for whatever reason desperately wants out.

Stand the Test wrote:

Ti Em wrote:

DD wrote:

KCEF wrote: Perth will coming out of this looking like amateurs. That’s a guarantee.

Now what could be more amateurish than a club that sets up a contracted required player from a rival club in a rental on the clubs doorstep and making all sorts of promises knowing full well he is ineligible for a clearance and heresay from a, disgruntled player is filtered down to supporters who jump on this forum bleeting about it.

It's blatantly obvious who are the true amateurs here.

Wow did any of that actually happen?

Nope ol Cody just sat down and said to himself, geez I’d love to play with ef. Not any other club, only ef. So then he knocks on doddy’s door and says, ‘hello you don’t know me but...’ and then Doddy says ‘wait you have to meet s guy, we call him buffalo,’. So Cody meets with buffalo and Cody says ‘i’ll only play half back’ and Buffalo goes ‘ okay no wuzzers bro, whatever you want!!’ And Cody goes ‘great. Oh and also I want to play afl.’ And buffalo goes no worries.

That’s probably what happened. All Cody’s work.

And of course you could'nt just pay him more money - the contract is sacrosanct!

Ti Em wrote:

DD wrote:

Ti Em wrote:

DD wrote:

KCEF wrote: Perth will coming out of this looking like amateurs. That’s a guarantee.

Now what could be more amateurish than a club that sets up a contracted required player from a rival club in a rental on the clubs doorstep and making all sorts of promises knowing full well he is ineligible for a clearance and heresay from a, disgruntled player is filtered down to supporters who jump on this forum bleeting about it.

It's blatantly obvious who are the true amateurs here.

Wow did any of that actually happen?

Well you will look pretty silly if it didn't, or should I say even sillier?

i am sure that makes sense to you DD. I will confess i have a not clue as to what you are on about. i'm just going along with the coach and the line that it is between Mineral Resources and the player. Whatever will be will be. Our season does not hinge on this or any one player - but you guys face ruin if he goes apparently. This would explain why you are so desperately trying to keep a player who for whatever reason desperately wants out.

You are delusional mate. You are the ones making the play, you are the ones with all the work to do. Simple fact is we are not going to allow a required contracted player we rate highly to switch to a rival club for standard fare. Is that difficult for you to comprehend?

Stand the Test wrote: Good luck at arbitration idiots.
If you are going to act badly you better win.

Arbitration? Mineral Resources are going to arbitration - not EFFC. Regardless of the outcome the player has walked.