TOPIC:

yeah...about as funny as you thinking whinging and whining on here like a school girl is going to make any difference.

I dont think it will make any difference at all, just giving an opinion.
whats funny is you Subi supporters having your head in the sand over this thinking you are some glory club and who have had the biggest cry in history the last 2 years over Peel getting an advantage at finals time.
absolute hypocrites.

MarkOlsen wrote:

BC wrote: instead of whinging on here why don't you put it in writing to the WAFC?

hah, you are a funny man...i write a letter and he's going to audit them is he ?
you guys really do have your head in the sand..

Your in good nick MO

MarkOlsen wrote: I dont think it will make any difference at all, just giving an opinion.
whats funny is you Subi supporters having your head in the sand over this thinking you are some glory club and who have had the biggest cry in history the last 2 years over Peel getting an advantage at finals time.
absolute hypocrites.

Spot on: Subiaco's "woe is me about the integrity of the WAFL GF" was only ever about improving Subiaco's chances of winning each and every GF. It most certainly had nothing whatsoever about improving the chances of the G6 clubs.

BC wrote: yeah...about as funny as you thinking whinging and whining on here like a school girl is going to make any difference.

BC, be careful what you wish for. I wouldn't get too cut up if you are found (officially) to be dodgy, the tainted flags seemed to sit well with the Ferals of 2000-01-02.

Freeze's topic has certainly highlighted the discern from supporters (bar BC of course) of all WAFL clubs re the ridiculous advantages $ubi have had over the G6 clubs.....although I am not sure that was the fella's original idea for the thread....dare I say it has backfired on our ol pommy/kiwi mate to be honest!!

No not really BH.....just opened the door for all n sundry to cry the typical woe is me regarding Subi's success and TBH all the creme de la creme thread does is put the Subi posters and moderator in good light, by showing they are open to discussion/banter pro and against the Subi Footy club.....unlike the thread you moderate and your brethren bruvva, where any negative banter is not tolerated and deleted by your good....but sadly sensitive selves......a shame really but I guess as expected......so well done you for highlighting that your approach to moderation is just as soft cockish as Waltons approach to the AFL/alignment......and 42 is just as deflective and evasive as Walton is, when asked a simple question.....so yep job done mate.....

Freezin wrote: No not really BH.....just opened the door for all n sundry to cry the typical woe is me regarding Subi's success and TBH all the creme de la creme thread does is put the Subi posters and moderator in good light, by showing they are open to discussion/banter pro and against the Subi Footy club.....unlike the thread you moderate and your brethren bruvva, where any negative banter is not tolerated and deleted by your good....but sadly sensitive selves......a shame really but I guess as expected......so well done you for highlighting that your approach to moderation is just as soft cockish as Waltons approach to the AFL/alignment......and 42 is just as deflective and evasive as Walton is, when asked a simple question.....so yep job done mate.....

freezin I have no intentions of humouring you when it is patently obvious the real reason behind a significant number of your posts. To put it succinctly to be contrary you would argue that black is white.

Freezin wrote: No not really BH.....just opened the door for all n sundry to cry the typical woe is me regarding Subi's success and TBH all the creme de la creme thread does is put the Subi posters and moderator in good light, by showing they are open to discussion/banter pro and against the Subi Footy club.....unlike the thread you moderate and your brethren bruvva, where any negative banter is not tolerated and deleted by your good....but sadly sensitive selves......a shame really but I guess as expected......so well done you for highlighting that your approach to moderation is just as soft cockish as Waltons approach to the AFL/alignment......and 42 is just as deflective and evasive as Walton is, when asked a simple question.....so yep job done mate.....

Because commenting on $ubi's success and how that has come about through their financial advantages on a SDFC Mid Season Report thread by a supposed EF supporter makes a whole lot of farken sense now doesnt it Freeze???.....talk about being disrespectful to the author of that particular topic!
At least now you have put the subject topic on the right club's thread albeit hasnt got anywhere near the sort of response you were really after now!!

that's all very well 42, but let's get back on topic here and answer Freezin's original question...which players are the cream of WAFL clubs Subi is supposed to have cherry picked in recent times? your words not mine...ffs...answer the question for once and if it's not F&B winners, state players, 100+ gamers that would be considered the cream then I think an unreserved apology is in order.