TOPIC:

BC wrote: Looking at that extended bench and on the presumption Horse, Clang and Corey are all good to go...who would you leave out? Joyce, Sokol and Halligan would be certain starters but a couple are going to be disappointed.

Normally Creeper and Stevo might be at risk but we need the big guys.
I would leave out Garcia for sure, wouldn't risk Ainsworth against these professional monsters, and make a tough call on Baker and Bryan.

I see on the WAFL website that Ainsworth, Bryan and Garcia have also been named in the ressies as well. If that's right it would leave 5 on the bench which suggests to me either Horse, Clanger or Adamson hasn't come up.

Seems like Horse is the one struggling BC which would mean we could be without our two best players pretty much...

If there's even a hint of doubt about Horse, I'd leave him another week. While we all want to go straight through to the GF, we do get a 2nd chance if we get rolled by Freo.

Agreed SS

yep...me too. I can't see Schowey taking risks with our most important player.

Go Subi, hope you can do, don't get a slow start, think we were asleep at the wheel at stages, bth I still think they had all the answers when it counted.

A Subi win is the ONLY way there will be an all WAFL final GF at Subi.

no disrespect to Swans but I hope you blokes get up as well. a Subi v SF GF would be a ripper....and on top of that if we're to lose, I'd much prefer it was to Souths than FART.

Considering SF and nearly every WAFL club has been Subi's bunny of late, great to see Subi getting challenged for once.....yeah not how most folk want it but Peel challenging Subi's recent WAFL dominance surely must get Subi's braintrust thinking and their competitive juices flowing....tho come end of the day if Peel were to lose this years GF, the WAFL will just simply turn around and say what unfair advantage does Peel have if they cant beat a team of semi professionals..seems to me for further changes to be made to alignment eligibility and fairness Subi need to take one for the comp and lose to Peel TBH....if they dont nothing will change in all honesty

Freezin wrote: Considering SF and nearly every WAFL club has been Subi's bunny of late, great to see Subi getting challenged for once.....yeah not how most folk want it but Peel challenging Subi's recent WAFL dominance surely must get Subi's braintrust thinking and their competitive juices flowing....tho come end of the day if Peel were to lose this years GF, the WAFL will just simply turn around and say what unfair advantage does Peel have if they cant beat a team of semi professionals..seems to me for further changes to be made to alignment eligibility and fairness Subi need to take one for the comp and lose to Peel TBH....if they dont nothing will change in all honesty

Freeze we took one for the comp last year, how many GF's do you want us to throw? Maybe when we've won 30 odd flags like your mob then we can take the foot off the pedal.