TOPIC:

satan311 wrote: Judging by who's named in the twos, the bench will be:
45 Regan CLARKE
11 Jack RICHARDSON
22 Samuel Stubbs
10 Matthew TAYLOR

Spot on.
Hansen, Nicholas, Marlin, Mercer named in Ressies
IMO, there could be a late surprise change.
Cannot believe that Peletier will play after last week's effort.

Dazzler wrote: This mob and SF are the best run and spread outfit in the comp. If we want to insist on playing a ridiculously high back half press and rely on Giblett and Coniglio's pace to get back when things go wrong and teams break through good luck against these Ponzi scheme bandits. That's why teams always remain a chance against us.

Some of you guys are fkn mental calling for Langdon to get dropped. Who did he play on last week?

Hard to see how we can improve our midfield but Stubbs has to come in and why not throw Zareth Roe in there for Rogers who will get a holiday although he's not going to give you any defensive pressure.

Looks like some us fkn mental guys were right about Langdon getting dropped.
The selectors agreed.

This is probably the weakest WP team for a number of years.
If we can’t beat this mob tomorrow probably time to give up.
In saying that the weather tomorrow will play a huge part in who wins this game.

I would have omitted Eyres and bought in a smaller quicker player and gone with McIness and Delahunty sharing ruck duties.
The team that is smartest with the wet ball and does away with the handball gets the 4 points.

30plusyeardrought wrote: This is probably the weakest WP team for a number of years.
If we can’t beat this mob tomorrow probably time to give up.
In saying that the weather tomorrow will play a huge part in who wins this game.

I would have omitted Eyres and bought in a smaller quicker player and gone with McIness and Delahunty sharing ruck duties.
The team that is smartest with the wet ball and does away with the handball gets the 4 points.

May be our weakest team but we are playing out of our skins and as a team, I like to hear the opposition supporters talk us down There is a late withdrawal for Perth too, a big one

Leedy wrote:

30plusyeardrought wrote: This is probably the weakest WP team for a number of years.
If we can’t beat this mob tomorrow probably time to give up.
In saying that the weather tomorrow will play a huge part in who wins this game.

I would have omitted Eyres and bought in a smaller quicker player and gone with McIness and Delahunty sharing ruck duties.
The team that is smartest with the wet ball and does away with the handball gets the 4 points.

May be our weakest team but we are playing out of our skins and as a team, I like to hear the opposition supporters talk us down There is a late withdrawal for Perth too, a big one

Who? Where do you hear these things?

Must be McIness or Masten they would be the only big outs imo.

Not putting your team down Leedy but I think you would agree it’s probably not the strongest WP team that’s been to Lathlain.

mmmm West Perth by 10 points at the very most - game of the round given the importance of this win to both clubs

30plusyeardrought wrote: Must be McIness or Masten they would be the only big outs imo.

Not putting your team down Leedy but I think you would agree it’s probably not the strongest WP team that’s been to Lathlain.

I disagree with that assessment. They've got 3 players in the top 5 possession getters in the comp and that doesn't include Luke Meadows. And they've got a forward line that regularly features in the top 5 goal kickers in the comp, often 2 in there. We struggle to have one in the top ten.

I would rate any of Grey, Sinclair and McDonald as big outs also. They along with Masten and McInnes are players we just cannot cover.

Dismal start to the day with the Colts getting a football lesson from West Perth.
One bright point is the continued good form of Conor McPartland.
His disposals so far this season are Rd 1 Peel..40, Rd 3 EP..29, Rd 4 EF..39, Rd 5 WP..33
Age 19, 176/86.
Must be in consideration for promotion to the senior list following Nathan O'Driscoll.

Could've, Should've, Didn't!