TOPIC:

Hawksta wrote: Might pay to do a bit of research there champ. I believe young Tuck was found in his car off his face on meth amphetamine and was sacked straight away and rightfully so.

My point is i have never been to game and heard so much filth, anger, anti social behaviour, drunkenness and simple lack of respect for young children. The collingwood ferals have nothing on the West Coast lot. Absolute disgrace they are and have no understanding of the rules. It is actually quite laughable at how little west coast fans know about AFL.

I thought the Cats game last year was bad but it had nothing on this one. Lucky the tickets were free. I took my young boy who is actually an eagles boy and it is such a shame that i cant take him without him being subjected to the most feral crowd in Australia.

Just stay out of the eight and make up the numbers you poor excuse of a drugged up football club.

And you think that Tuck is the only player at the Hawks that has been done for drugs? HA! If names were released on the 'strikes' list you would see otherwise.

Yea, you might say that but I have seen and heard stuff just as bad, if not worse come out of peoples mouths from all clubs. Including your beloved hawks when I saw them get beaten by the Cats last year in the ripping game on Friday night. I also went to the Freo v Pies game at subi earlier this year and one of the female friends I was with who was wearing a Pies supporter got verbally abused and threatened by a Freo supporter... who was a MALE (real tough cunt picking a fight with a girl that weighs about 50kg). Not to mention all the people who have been banned / fine / whatever for racism. I am not going to sit here and say that WCE fans are perfect and walk around with a halo over their heads, because there is plenty of them that are absolute morons, but to say the majority are like that is a crock of shit.

You're right about not making the 8 though. Put money on that @ $1.87 4 or 5 weeks ago. Free money!

anchorman wrote: You keep telling yourself that Yolo. After a while they will believe you.It is like the substance that the Bombers are alleged to have been injected with,they now say it is not performance enhancing.But the material that was handed around prior to them taking it suggested it did.Suggested it increased bulk and endurance.
But go ahead like so many Eagles fans and believe.
All clubs have these issues,some worse than others.

Thank God the dorks are clean with no history

swan42 wrote:

anchorman wrote: Swan he said on the couch that he was injected with the banned substance.When asked by Healy he said yes I was injected with the substance.
He has admitted to it.If you are debating whether the subsatnce is banned then look at what WADA is saying.They banned it as from 1st January 2011.

A/man Jobe Watson has not admitted publicly that he has taken a banned substance. In fact on the programme in question he specifically denied taking a banned substance. I am fully cognisant of what the WADA President has said with respect to AOD9604.

However, until WADA/ASADA issue infraction notices against any of the footballers or they admit guilt it is entirely appropriate for them to continue playing. If however, they are subsequently found to have taken a banned substance then they will receive an appropriate penalty. For example, if a tennis player returns a positive test or is served with an infraction notice, then they forfeit all moneys and points from that point on. A similar result one would expect for any Essendon footballer if they are served with an infraction notice.

...and the planet you live on is called??????

This argument is getting boring - we've been through it a dozen times. Fact is, if an amnesty was given, there would probably be a majority of clubs owning up. The Eagles got caught out mainly because of those involved were stupid enough to believe they were above the law. The rest were just that bit smarter, so didn't get caught. If you want to talk about a 'drugged up club', I believe there is 2 of them well entrenched in the top 8. Short of injunctions, they will eventually get sprung - after Vlad gets ousted for someone that cares about ALL clubs.

yolo swaggins wrote:

anchorman wrote: You keep telling yourself that Yolo. After a while they will believe you.It is like the substance that the Bombers are alleged to have been injected with,they now say it is not performance enhancing.But the material that was handed around prior to them taking it suggested it did.Suggested it increased bulk and endurance.
But go ahead like so many Eagles fans and believe.
All clubs have these issues,some worse than others.

Believe what exactly? That meth and coke are not performance enhancing? Because they are not. FACT.
Also, jsut because WCE illicit drug issues were made public, it doesnt mean that they are better or worse than any other team. Every single team in the AFL would have players partaking in recreational drug use and just because Cousins had an addiction and there was a handful or others that might of smashed old mate Charlie or the shards a bit too hard, it doesnt mean that WCE as a club are worse. Its only because it was all made public that all of a sudden WCE are the 'biggest druggies in the world'. Lets not forget that M.Johnson got caught with coke on him, so did Stokes. There was a Hawks player who got banned due to the 3 strikes rule (cant remember his name) plus numerous people from all clubs on 1 or 2 strikes.

Meth can be peformance enhancing..FACT

They are both banned substances FACT

The eagles history certainly does them no favours and ceratinly makes them no cleaner than anyone else.

yes the cats and dockers have had problems..but so far its pure speculation that any other club had anything like the issues with a player or players that the eagles had...a full blown junkie.

Bazza wrote:

yolo swaggins wrote:

anchorman wrote: You keep telling yourself that Yolo. After a while they will believe you.It is like the substance that the Bombers are alleged to have been injected with,they now say it is not performance enhancing.But the material that was handed around prior to them taking it suggested it did.Suggested it increased bulk and endurance.
But go ahead like so many Eagles fans and believe.
All clubs have these issues,some worse than others.

Believe what exactly? That meth and coke are not performance enhancing? Because they are not. FACT.
Also, jsut because WCE illicit drug issues were made public, it doesnt mean that they are better or worse than any other team. Every single team in the AFL would have players partaking in recreational drug use and just because Cousins had an addiction and there was a handful or others that might of smashed old mate Charlie or the shards a bit too hard, it doesnt mean that WCE as a club are worse. Its only because it was all made public that all of a sudden WCE are the 'biggest druggies in the world'. Lets not forget that M.Johnson got caught with coke on him, so did Stokes. There was a Hawks player who got banned due to the 3 strikes rule (cant remember his name) plus numerous people from all clubs on 1 or 2 strikes.

Meth can be peformance enhancing..FACT

They are both banned substances FACT

The eagles history certainly does them no favours and ceratinly makes them no cleaner than anyone else.

yes the cats and dockers have had problems..but so far its pure speculation that any other club had anything like the issues with a player or players that the eagles had...a full blown junkie.

I would dispute that meth is performance enhancing, but I'm no Doc, so have to take your sage advice on this.
What is it with you and the Eagles mate? They are arguably one of the cleanest clubs compared to a lot of others nowadays, but all you want to do is talk about crap from 6-7 years ago. I reckon you're a closet Eagles supporter....you seem to love talking about them

Well,well,well the Eagles supporters decked out in Collingwood gear were out in force at the MCG last night.
Malthouse shown on the big screen last night....Booed loudly by the Eagles supporters masquerading as Collingwood supporters...lol
Wasnt Malthouse a Premiership,over a decade coach for the Pies?????

What a disgrace as the title thread states!!

Maybe UNK can enlighten us as this thing only goes on at Subi oval in front of Eagles supporters!!

dont bother 30plus it appears some will never be convinced. it goes on everywhere. malthouse no longer a magpie & they let him know it regardless of circumstances. thats footy

i remember wayne carey getting severely booed by our faithful when adelaide came to town. never thought id see the day. but he did gut the club and its captain. not to mention himself after football. though i didnt like it, the boos were not a suprise. certainly added to the drama that night.

look at the st.kilda supporters with ross lyon? didnt hear 1 single word of condemnation from the media about that. they are a victorian club of course. that explains it.

30plusyeardrought wrote: Well,well,well the Eagles supporters decked out in Collingwood gear were out in force at the MCG last night.
Malthouse shown on the big screen last night....Booed loudly by the Eagles supporters masquerading as Collingwood supporters...lol
Wasnt Malthouse a Premiership,over a decade coach for the Pies?????

What a disgrace as the title thread states!!

Maybe UNK can enlighten us as this thing only goes on at Subi oval in front of Eagles supporters!!

58shark wrote:

30plusyeardrought wrote: Well,well,well the Eagles supporters decked out in Collingwood gear were out in force at the MCG last night.
Malthouse shown on the big screen last night....Booed loudly by the Eagles supporters masquerading as Collingwood supporters...lol
Wasnt Malthouse a Premiership,over a decade coach for the Pies?????

What a disgrace as the title thread states!!

Maybe UNK can enlighten us as this thing only goes on at Subi oval in front of Eagles supporters!!

Hmmm perhaps its cos Pies v Blues are ARCH enemies, still living here with little if any understanding of rivally which steams from 100 plus years.