TOPIC:

We're two weeks into a three year deal and it's an outrage we haven't seen a 30% increase in crowd figures.

OUTRAGE!!!!

Barney wrote: We're two weeks into a three year deal and it's an outrage we haven't seen a 30% increase in crowd figures.

OUTRAGE!!!!

The stench of the host club alignment is all pervading.

myself and 4 other loyal Swans have no interest in attending WC reserves games at Leederville, all are Swans members for over 30 years.
create a joke of a comp and these things happen I suppose.

There is video evidence. Lucky that Rogers didn't get a broken leg or ankle from Johnson sliding in. As I said earlier,one player had the correct technique and one didn't. He's been penalised because of head high contact which he didn't intiate.Pretty sure we will be appealing.

MarkOlsen wrote: myself and 4 other loyal Swans have no interest in attending WC reserves games at Leederville, all are Swans members for over 30 years.
create a joke of a comp and these things happen I suppose.

Yawn friggin' yawn.

As it wasn't on TV or radio you five are the losers here as it was a good game.

Anyone else sick of these Swannie Boys whinging on about how the alignment is such a bad thing and how it makes Peel and EP superpowers? The evidence is plainly there by the games played, no Premiership for EP, games lost and a 15 Freo player Peel losing to a middle runner.

The way you guys carry on you think the one sided conquering you expected by East Perth would be akin to when Toddy sent our Reserves over to play Richmond in that night Escort Cup game in the 80's, it just hasn't happened like that.

In fact, if Rogers had have nailed Paul Johnson a bit earlier in the day we would have won, would that have shut you guys up? I think not.

i've been a financial member of Swans for over 30 years, what about yourself ShinyDuck ?
if i choose to attend or not-attend a game for any reason that is up to me, I dont want to give money to the Eagles which is my right and I dont agree with the host club situation so I choose not to attend.

feel free to post somewhere else if what the Swans supporters say on here bothers you.

your 4000 posts about a car incident was the biggest yawn on here of all time.

swan42 wrote:

Barney wrote: We're two weeks into a three year deal and it's an outrage we haven't seen a 30% increase in crowd figures.

OUTRAGE!!!!

The stench of the host club alignment is all pervading.

Yep that's why there has a been an almost 200% average inrease in viewership in the first two weeks.

I have been planning my swap from EP to another club if the alignment continues after five years. WP is my local club but if people like Cardy, Leedy etc are a guide I would not enjoy my football there. I have always thought Swans would be my pick but I have been completely disheartened by most of the Swans forum members on here. You can pour millions into promoting the WAFL your return will be virtually zero, that's sad in my opinion but only fossils like me give a hoot.

Barney wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Barney wrote: We're two weeks into a three year deal and it's an outrage we haven't seen a 30% increase in crowd figures.

OUTRAGE!!!!

The stench of the host club alignment is all pervading.

Yep that's why there has a been an almost 200% average inrease in viewership in the first two weeks.

What will the increase in TV viewership be for Round 4 Barney?

How about comparing oranges with oranges vis a vis against AFL competition.

Come across to Subi Larry...I'm a Boston Celtics fan so you should be right.