TOPIC:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: See above Swan , as tiger says zero of that rant has to do with decisions made wholly by the wpfc which appear to be possibility in breach of their duties under the incorporations act.

Your ability to APPARENTLY know everything about the WP situation is simply remarkable. You truly are an acolyte of those who live in alternate realities.

Well I'm personally aware of payments they are making but shouldn't be.. but that's the wafc's fault?

Really? You would be well advised to be very careful making such an allegation.

The day I take legal advice from u swan, is the day your beloved Dockers win a gf

As I suspected the proverbial grain of salt is what ANYONE should take of your postings.

What... Because some of us are educated on the financial diligence the WAFC undertakes to do there utmost to ensure wafl clubs are solvent to catch issues like this before they get out of hand???

Educate yourself Swan,

I'm tipping criminal charges will come from this....

Look in the mirror uhtb. There, their, they're: I wonder which one should have been used in the above post?

Exactly how would you know what the WAFC do with respect to due diligence? Is this the "august" body that sent to all WAFL clubs the player payments of a WAFL club?

How much due diligence was done with respect to the millions wasted on the unsuccessful bid to get the new stadium's management role? Did the WAFC ignore advice that there was little or no chance of them winning the bid?

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: See above Swan , as tiger says zero of that rant has to do with decisions made wholly by the wpfc which appear to be possibility in breach of their duties under the incorporations act.

Your ability to APPARENTLY know everything about the WP situation is simply remarkable. You truly are an acolyte of those who live in alternate realities.

Well I'm personally aware of payments they are making but shouldn't be.. but that's the wafc's fault?

Really? You would be well advised to be very careful making such an allegation.

Whos going to sue? Theres no board in existence anymore...lol

Bazza wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: See above Swan , as tiger says zero of that rant has to do with decisions made wholly by the wpfc which appear to be possibility in breach of their duties under the incorporations act.

Your ability to APPARENTLY know everything about the WP situation is simply remarkable. You truly are an acolyte of those who live in alternate realities.

Well I'm personally aware of payments they are making but shouldn't be.. but that's the wafc's fault?

Really? You would be well advised to be very careful making such an allegation.

Whos going to sue? Theres no board in existence anymore...lol

Bazza who mentioned that action?

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: See above Swan , as tiger says zero of that rant has to do with decisions made wholly by the wpfc which appear to be possibility in breach of their duties under the incorporations act.

Your ability to APPARENTLY know everything about the WP situation is simply remarkable. You truly are an acolyte of those who live in alternate realities.

Well I'm personally aware of payments they are making but shouldn't be.. but that's the wafc's fault?

Really? You would be well advised to be very careful making such an allegation.

The day I take legal advice from u swan, is the day your beloved Dockers win a gf

As I suspected the proverbial grain of salt is what ANYONE should take of your postings.

What... Because some of us are educated on the financial diligence the WAFC undertakes to do there utmost to ensure wafl clubs are solvent to catch issues like this before they get out of hand???

Educate yourself Swan,

I'm tipping criminal charges will come from this....

Look in the mirror uhtb. There, their, they're: I wonder which one should have been used in the above post?

Exactly how would you know what the WAFC do with respect to due diligence? Is this the "august" body that sent to all WAFL clubs the player payments of a WAFL club?

How much due diligence was done with respect to the millions wasted on the unsuccessful bid to get the new stadium's management role? Did the WAFC ignore advice that there was little or no chance of them winning the bid?

Eerrr.... check the WAFL bylaws swan, u might find something in their under finances.

I'm just going to point out how stupid u are.. I'll apologize in advance... Remember how the WAFC managed Subiaco oval and intern poored millions from the money they made back into Grass Roots.

God forbid they even attempt to recreate that at Optus.. possibly your dumbest post yet.

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: See above Swan , as tiger says zero of that rant has to do with decisions made wholly by the wpfc which appear to be possibility in breach of their duties under the incorporations act.

Your ability to APPARENTLY know everything about the WP situation is simply remarkable. You truly are an acolyte of those who live in alternate realities.

Well I'm personally aware of payments they are making but shouldn't be.. but that's the wafc's fault?

Really? You would be well advised to be very careful making such an allegation.

The day I take legal advice from u swan, is the day your beloved Dockers win a gf

As I suspected the proverbial grain of salt is what ANYONE should take of your postings.

What... Because some of us are educated on the financial diligence the WAFC undertakes to do there utmost to ensure wafl clubs are solvent to catch issues like this before they get out of hand???

Educate yourself Swan,

I'm tipping criminal charges will come from this....

Look in the mirror uhtb. There, their, they're: I wonder which one should have been used in the above post?

Exactly how would you know what the WAFC do with respect to due diligence? Is this the "august" body that sent to all WAFL clubs the player payments of a WAFL club?

How much due diligence was done with respect to the millions wasted on the unsuccessful bid to get the new stadium's management role? Did the WAFC ignore advice that there was little or no chance of them winning the bid?

Straws clutching wtf has that got to do with Wpfc?

And then the government chose a company that is not 100% Australian owned. Wafc had a good crack at it and should have got it.

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Unholytugboat wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Bazza wrote: See above Swan , as tiger says zero of that rant has to do with decisions made wholly by the wpfc which appear to be possibility in breach of their duties under the incorporations act.

Your ability to APPARENTLY know everything about the WP situation is simply remarkable. You truly are an acolyte of those who live in alternate realities.

Well I'm personally aware of payments they are making but shouldn't be.. but that's the wafc's fault?

Really? You would be well advised to be very careful making such an allegation.

The day I take legal advice from u swan, is the day your beloved Dockers win a gf

As I suspected the proverbial grain of salt is what ANYONE should take of your postings.

What... Because some of us are educated on the financial diligence the WAFC undertakes to do there utmost to ensure wafl clubs are solvent to catch issues like this before they get out of hand???

Educate yourself Swan,

I'm tipping criminal charges will come from this....

Look in the mirror uhtb. There, their, they're: I wonder which one should have been used in the above post?

Exactly how would you know what the WAFC do with respect to due diligence? Is this the "august" body that sent to all WAFL clubs the player payments of a WAFL club?

How much due diligence was done with respect to the millions wasted on the unsuccessful bid to get the new stadium's management role? Did the WAFC ignore advice that there was little or no chance of them winning the bid?

Eerrr.... check the WAFL bylaws swan, u might find something in their under finances.

I'm just going to point out how stupid u are.. I'll apologize in advance... Remember how the WAFC managed Subiaco oval and intern poored millions from the money they made back into Grass Roots.

God forbid they even attempt to recreate that at Optus.. possibly your dumbest post yet.

They spent millions trying to win the new stadium management rights after they were told they had virtually no hope of winning them.

The WAFC has overseen a drop in average attendances of over 2,000 for 7 of the WAFL clubs in 2012 to one club averaging more than 2,000 in 2018. And from memory there was only one other club that averages more than 1,650 in 2018.

Swan you do know the wafc wrote out a 250k cheque today as urgent funding to keep wpfc doors open till the end of the season.

Along with that wpfc owe thousands to the ato , how the hell is that the fault of the wafc?

This is another sign that the WAFL cannot survive without apocalyptic change. The AFL and AFL clubs are kings of WA and the reality of the times we live in is that a WAFL club has zero influence on any other footy entity in the zone it is given by the wafc. Go talk to a junior or amateur or school player or coach or helper, they will tell you that if the falcons were gone tomorrow it will not effect them in any way, junior and senior clubs are all profitable and healthy, talented players will find always get their way to the talent pathway, amateurs will be stronger and the sun will still rise tomorrow. I feel for the WAFL as it is WA's premier footy comp, but i do wonder what would be the situation now if the WAFL DID find a way to exist in the era of local AFL, DID change with the times decades ago when the afl arrived in town, or did find a way to become more relevant to their aligned zone clubs. BTW, smart business would be that if you set up a cafe business in Wanneroo you dont call yourself Leederville cafe. How many people has this confused over the last 20 odd years let alone COJ. WP had a tough challenge when they moved to Arena and that would have sucked but I hope the falcons find a way out of this mess for the longer term and that the broader wafl comp and clubs understand how the rest of the footy world outside of their bubbles perceive them. Just saying.

Unholytugboat wrote: And then the government chose a company that is not 100% Australian owned. Wafc had a good crack at it and should have got it.

I agree with you.If clubs do go kaput it will be because a private company got the gig at managing the stadium to the detriment of wafl.