Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 53

Notice: Undefined variable: ub in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65

Deprecated: strripos(): Non-string needles will be interpreted as strings in the future. Use an explicit chr() call to preserve the current behavior in /home/dh_ingvwb/ozfooty.net/templates/hot_cars/js/browser.php on line 65
Welcome, Member
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC:

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5666

  • MarkOlsen
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3137
  • Thank you received: 516
they didnt see eye-to-eye when they filled the roles of Under-Treasurer and Treasurer when Court was in charge..
Langoulant actually publically complained to Court about Colin's spending as Treasurer..
the report was never going to get taken seriously once Colin took over..

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5668

  • Johnno
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor

DaveRoyal wrote: I think it'll be closer than you think. Last time Barnett won the seemingly unwinnable - anything is possible.

I think as poll day gets closer people more people will vote against Barnett when they compare whats on the table.

As for the stadium - I think we should all be concerned that the professionally prepared Langoulant Report which said that Kitchener Park (ie not a Subi upgrade - a total rebuild) was a better option but has been totally ignored by the current government and the bottom option on the report has been taken up instead. Why? Why does arrogant Colin think he knows better than a professional who weighed up all considerations? This Packer thing can be the only conclusion one can draw from this.


I think there is an even better option, Wellington Square in East Perth. I mean if the government is prepared to rip up a large piece of green grass on the Esplanade that working people used to use every day to exercise, play sport, eat their lunch etc....to build a waterfront then i can't see why using this huge park which is ideally located in the heart of Perth smack in between the city and Burswood has not been seriously considered? The main people i see using that park when i drive past is aboriginals drinking booze.

There would be more transport options to and from this location.

Kitchener Park has a much wider expanse of real estate to build a stadium on than the thin edge of the wedge where Subiaco Oval is now and if they extend the sinking of the Fremantle rail line (already sunk in most of Subiaco) then that gives greater access to and from the venue.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Johnno.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5672

  • Swandog
  • Swandog's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3609
  • Thank you received: 386
I hope its at Burswood and sinks into the mud and rubbish, that would karma for Barnett and also the AFL
Beneath the Southern cross i stand, on Bassendean Oval, can in hand, Swan Districts, you Farkin Beauty!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5681

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

DaveRoyal wrote:

UNKA2 wrote: George Swandog and Cardy, i serioulsy suggest you ring Mark Mc Gowan, and adivise hime of your 3 votes...it will be enough for him to bring on the champers to celebrate!!.
Reckon its just doubled his chances!


I think it'll be closer than you think. Last time Barnett won the seemingly unwinnable - anything is possible.

I think as poll day gets closer people more people will vote against Barnett when they compare whats on the table.

As for the stadium - I think we should all be concerned that the professionally prepared Langoulant Report which said that Kitchener Park (ie not a Subi upgrade - a total rebuild) was a better option but has been totally ignored by the current government and the bottom option on the report has been taken up instead. Why? Why does arrogant Colin think he knows better than a professional who weighed up all considerations? This Packer thing can be the only conclusion one can draw from this.


Mc Gowan, will get FLOGGED, of that i am sure. Barnett has stood up against federal labor, and the facts seem to be everyone hates Julia, hence why mc Gowan doesnt want her here during the campaign, that in itself shows how much labor is on the nose here.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5682

  • Swandog
  • Swandog's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3609
  • Thank you received: 386
My straw poll suggests otherwise UNK re McGowan getting flogged
Beneath the Southern cross i stand, on Bassendean Oval, can in hand, Swan Districts, you Farkin Beauty!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5689

  • Johnno
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor

UNKA2 wrote: Mc Gowan, will get FLOGGED, of that i am sure. Barnett has stood up against federal labor, and the facts seem to be everyone hates Julia, hence why mc Gowan doesnt want her here during the campaign, that in itself shows how much labor is on the nose here.


History shows who is in favour or in power federally has little to no impact on state elections. It will be an election where Barney's arrogance and Troy the boy Buswell's private antics and soap opera will be judged. How many lives has Barney given Jack the Lad?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Johnno.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5690

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

Swandog wrote: My straw poll suggests otherwise UNK re McGowan getting flogged


Yeah but you only got 2 straws in the poll mate...no wonder its 50/50 :lol:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5691

  • UNKA2
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1800
  • Thank you received: 116

Johnno wrote:

UNKA2 wrote: Mc Gowan, will get FLOGGED, of that i am sure. Barnett has stood up against federal labor, and the facts seem to be everyone hates Julia, hence why mc Gowan doesnt want her here during the campaign, that in itself shows how much labor is on the nose here.


History shows who is in favour or in power federally has little to no impact on state elections. It will be an election where Barney's arrogance and Troy the boy Buswell's private antics and soap opera will be judged. How many lives has Barney given Jack the Lad?


Keep telling ya they are ALL ARROGANT.... i aint politically inlcined one way or the other...but Mc Gowan , will be crucified. Pity we cant have a punt on it

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5698

  • Chopper
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 762
  • Thank you received: 0

DaveRoyal wrote:

UNKA2 wrote: George Swandog and Cardy, i serioulsy suggest you ring Mark Mc Gowan, and adivise hime of your 3 votes...it will be enough for him to bring on the champers to celebrate!!.
Reckon its just doubled his chances!


I think it'll be closer than you think. Last time Barnett won the seemingly unwinnable - anything is possible.

I think as poll day gets closer people more people will vote against Barnett when they compare whats on the table.

As for the stadium - I think we should all be concerned that the professionally prepared Langoulant Report which said that Kitchener Park (ie not a Subi upgrade - a total rebuild) was a better option but has been totally ignored by the current government and the bottom option on the report has been taken up instead. Why? Why does arrogant Colin think he knows better than a professional who weighed up all considerations? This Packer thing can be the only conclusion one can draw from this.


I think that if it's near the Casino it will be more of an attraction than at Subi and if Labor get in there is talk they are building an invisible underwater railway linking up with the City.

I'm sure that's what I heard ?????????

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Barnett - Arrogant? 11 years 11 months ago #5699

  • Johnno
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor

Chopper wrote: I think that if it's near the Casino it will be more of an attraction than at Subi and if Labor get in there is talk they are building an invisible underwater railway linking up with the City.

I'm sure that's what I heard ?????????

Barnet has said people will have to get used to taking the train to the footy, in other words you will not be able to get within cooeee of it in car so tell me what the attraction is to having it beside the Casino? Do you think James Packer is going to allow thousands of sweaty smelly football fans decked out in their teams kit and carrying a bag they took their lunch in to the Crown Casino? I don't think so. Another well thought out masterplan by Colin Barnett.

It is probably easier now at Subi if you want you can walk back to your car, have a change of shirt, a bit of deodorant and off you go and dump your bag, footy budget, cap etc... in the car and go wherever you want to go for tea whether it be Subi, city, Burswood or elsewhere which i think a lot of people do.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Johnno.

Search

Keyword

Who's Online?

We have 268 guests and no members online

Newest Footy Recruits

  • Franciswrozy
  • HenryEldek
  • Stevavecy
  • Lost WAFL
  • Duncs1977