TOPIC:

swansfan4life wrote: The obvious solution is to change the number of games a player needs to qualify. Instead of 5 it should now be 10 or 12. That would hopefully lessen the number of players available to the alignment clubs come finals time

Good idea. It could be 10 or 12 for AFL listed players but remain at 5 for players who are not.

Barney wrote: Sat on your own, says a lot really! Or did you just look through the fence and save $15?

Respond to what, you didn't ask a question. You just made another grandstanding statement that makes little sense that everyone seems to have ignored. That says a lot as well.

I didn't say I sat on my own you twit.

And OK Mr.Smart Arse, I challenged a response to the statement which you avoided yet again with a meek excuse. Might be because if you answer Yes to both, you will basically agree with me. And if you answer No to both, you will admit you are happy to ride on the coattails of the Eagles players, whatever gets success. In other words you know your stuffed either way.

At the least I respect Grump for his work with the colts, I just don't agree with him in regards to the overall package. He can rip me a new one, that's fine. I think the league side is a fair chunk of this football club. Pretending it doesn't exist after 100 years isn't the right way to approach it. We agree to disagree - completely.

Hey, let's all be friends.

ShinyDuck wrote: Hey, let's all be friends.

why would you bother?

jardine wrote:

ShinyDuck wrote: Hey, let's all be friends.

why would you bother?

Ummm ... dunno.

Nah let's all chill a bit and get back to our common love ... footy. I have been the main victim of their venom here on many an occasion, don't let it get to you buddy, your contributions are most welcome.

ShinyDuck wrote: don't let it get to you buddy

It isn't

yolo swaggins wrote:

swansfan4life wrote: The obvious solution is to change the number of games a player needs to qualify. Instead of 5 it should now be 10 or 12. That would hopefully lessen the number of players available to the alignment clubs come finals time

Good idea. It could be 10 or 12 for AFL listed players but remain at 5 for players who are not.

It sounds like a good idea in theory; however, the bottom line is that if the Eagles were in the finals and they had 22 players on their list that they wanted to play in the WAFL finals and "East Perth" were in the finals that is exactly the number of Eagles players who would play in the WAFL finals.