TOPIC:

Ted Nugent wrote: Bill is being incredibly disingenuous. You offer Leggett substantially more money. Worse still, you sell false hope that his draft chances are somehow improved at EF. Then you step back, put your hands up and say "nothing to do with us, it's between Leggett and Perth." Contemptible.

Any proof or evidence to support your claims of pay and draft prospects?

Ted Nugent wrote: Bill is being incredibly disingenuous. You offer Leggett substantially more money. Worse still, you sell false hope that his draft chances are somehow improved at EF. Then you step back, put your hands up and say "nothing to do with us, it's between Leggett and Perth." Contemptible.

I think you're being a little harsh. From the sounds of it, Leggett was done at Perth. That had nothing to do with EF. EF then sold their program to the player. It's 2 seperate things

KCEF wrote:

Ted Nugent wrote: Bill is being incredibly disingenuous. You offer Leggett substantially more money. Worse still, you sell false hope that his draft chances are somehow improved at EF. Then you step back, put your hands up and say "nothing to do with us, it's between Leggett and Perth." Contemptible.

I think you're being a little harsh. From the sounds of it, Leggett was done at Perth. That had nothing to do with EF. EF then sold their program to the player. It's 2 seperate things

Yes agreed hardly EFFCs fault the player wants to go to a better club. If he had any sense he would of had that as a get out clause in his contract. Getting off track about but with required players wanting out at Mineral Resources are we about to see them going back to being whipping boys after last year's 9 &9 blip?

Yep, Perth going back to being bottom three will be a great look for the WAFL after all the talk about equalising the comp. Glad you're so excited by the prospect, Ti Em.

Ted Nugent wrote: Yep, Perth going back to being bottom three will be a great look for the WAFL after all the talk about equalising the comp. Glad you're so excited by the prospect, Ti Em.

You guys will be fine, Ted. You've recruited well. Losing Leggett isn't going to make you drop games

Ted Nugent wrote: Yep, Perth going back to being bottom three will be a great look for the WAFL after all the talk about equalising the comp. Glad you're so excited by the prospect, Ti Em.

Yeah blame everyone but yourself - seems the usual Mineral Resources logic. Why jump to conclusions I am excited by any on field demise for Mineral Resources? I was merely speculately. I guess supporting evidence is not a strong point of yours.

KCEF, after wining the first 5 games last year, we won 4 out of 13, making us the second worst performed team from that point. If Leggett goes, we will have lost two players who finished top 5 in the F & B. On top of that, we've lost Ninyette, Garstone, Narrier and quite possibly Bennell. Of our recruits, only Masten and Murphy are proven players. I know some Perth posters have talked up our chances, but I don't share their optimism. Few clubs can afford to lose two of their top five players, least of all Perth.

Ted Nugent wrote: Bill is being incredibly disingenuous. You offer Leggett substantially more money. Worse still, you sell false hope that his draft chances are somehow improved at EF. Then you step back, put your hands up and say "nothing to do with us, it's between Leggett and Perth." Contemptible.

Unlike you Ted to tell a few unsubstantiated porkies mate....please don't tell us DD, Smokester, DF and STT are your sources for the above mate...farking blind leading the blind there...

Maybe Ted, but I think you’ve lost them regardless of Arbitration result. You’ve also added Delahunty (unknown) and Byrne is like a new recruit. Masten will be massive and your Mids look better balanced with just Yeo, Byrne and Masten. Both offering more speed and run than Jones and Leggett.

Does anyone know when the arbitration meeting is scheduled for