TOPIC:

mikeh wrote: How did the bark in the park go by the way? Loved the picture of the two Labradors on the Subiaco website as well. Good initiative for Guide Dogs WA and the dog refuge.

They were rattling tins at the gate and with a good crowd of over 2000 hopefully they raised a bit.

BC wrote: so what?...they still had to pay a fine for being salary cap cheats.

whereabouts did it say in the article the fine was for cheating ?

I will help you out since you are not very smart.

breach and cheat are not the same word.

Jjim wrote: I agree 2046 seemed over the top to me as well . I thought 1100-1200 tops unless they all left after colts game??

Official WAFL attendance

Theouterseagull wrote:

BC wrote: so what?...they still had to pay a fine for being salary cap cheats.

But they only cheated a little bit so that's fine.
After all the crying and attempting to ride their high horse we now find the 2 precious sisters stalking the Subiaco thread. You would think that they would show some respect to Ozfooty in its final weeks but they appear too childish and envious of our success.

do you know the difference between breach and cheat.
your rubbish posts need to be exposed, pity for others on here they need to read your made up stories.

MarkOlsen wrote:

Theouterseagull wrote:

BC wrote: so what?...they still had to pay a fine for being salary cap cheats.

But they only cheated a little bit so that's fine.
After all the crying and attempting to ride their high horse we now find the 2 precious sisters stalking the Subiaco thread. You would think that they would show some respect to Ozfooty in its final weeks but they appear too childish and envious of our success.

do you know the difference between breach and cheat.
your rubbish posts need to be exposed, pity for others on here they need to read your made up stories.

You're wasting your time here on the Subi thread mate, you need to head over to the WAFL thread to attempt to discredit the latest official WAFL attendance figures.

little less time on facebook and more time reading a dictionary and you might say something credible.

MarkOlsen wrote: little less time on facebook and more time reading a dictionary and you might say something credible.

Like I said before, how about we show some respect for this site and move on from whatever has happened in the past and keep it to footy chat.

the bogans made 8 declaration errors which were the subject of pecuniary action by the WAFL...given clubs know exactly what should be included and what is excluded from the declaration, the average joe blow could be excused for thinking they were deliberate acts of concealing payments to players. now if you want to write it off as a breach then that's like saying Lance Armstrong breached the rules of WADA but didn't cheat....good luck with that.