TOPIC:

Beasley Hutton wrote: So why all the hoo ha from you lot about your so called disadvantaged zone?? I have just pointed out one of your metro junior clubs is bigger than any in Swans zone and you lot still cry poor (probably bad terminology on my part considering it is $ubi we are talking about here)

BH Subi have 1730 junior footballers not including Auskick.
Swans have over 2500 not including Auskick..
Subi have 7 clubs in the district so they have to be bigger...
Swans have 19 clubs in their zone....
That's the facts..

BigO wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: So why all the hoo ha from you lot about your so called disadvantaged zone?? I have just pointed out one of your metro junior clubs is bigger than any in Swans zone and you lot still cry poor (probably bad terminology on my part considering it is $ubi we are talking about here)

BH Subi have 1730 junior footballers not including Auskick.
Swans have over 2500 not including Auskick..
Subi have 7 clubs in the district so they have to be bigger...
Swans have 19 clubs in their zone....
That's the facts..

So which club in Swans zone has bigger numbers than Kingsway out of interest?

good synopsis SS. I'm really impressed with the form of some of the so called second string players who are keeping the likes of Blech out of the one's. Schoey keeps giving these guys game time and they don't disappoint. Competition for places is really high and will only get harder when Waters, Dela, Robinson, Mahoney and co return.

Beasley Hutton wrote:

BigO wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: So why all the hoo ha from you lot about your so called disadvantaged zone?? I have just pointed out one of your metro junior clubs is bigger than any in Swans zone and you lot still cry poor (probably bad terminology on my part considering it is $ubi we are talking about here)

BH Subi have 1730 junior footballers not including Auskick.
Swans have over 2500 not including Auskick..
Subi have 7 clubs in the district so they have to be bigger...
Swans have 19 clubs in their zone....
That's the facts..

So which club in Swans zone has bigger numbers than Kingsway out of interest?

Upper Swan the same in Junior Footy with Kalamunda just behind but a lot less in Auskick numbers as Kingsway a new area...

BC wrote: from memory...we're on 129 points for a total of 59 players BH....what is Swans tally?

we have 38 points taken up by 9 players, everyone else is a 1 point player.
therefore we would need a list of 100 players to match Subi's 129 points for 59 players.

we do have a 5 point player in the colts from Alice Springs !

That's nice MO. Do you happen to know what your tally was in 2010?

no, do you ?

No idea I was just curious.

DG wrote: That's nice MO. Do you happen to know what your tally was in 2010?

About 130 sudafed tablets

BigO wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: So why all the hoo ha from you lot about your so called disadvantaged zone?? I have just pointed out one of your metro junior clubs is bigger than any in Swans zone and you lot still cry poor (probably bad terminology on my part considering it is $ubi we are talking about here)

BH Subi have 1730 junior footballers not including Auskick.
Swans have over 2500 not including Auskick..
Subi have 7 clubs in the district so they have to be bigger...
Swans have 19 clubs in their zone....
That's the facts..

Just got the old casio out and after a good 15min of punching numbers I came to the conclusion that 2500 is more than 1730.