TOPIC:

Bazza wrote: WA Nats have just announced they no longer support him..

Just a matter of time now and the rest will follow....

Bazz I dont think the Wa Nat's and the Federal Party have been aligned since 2010.

Goneski

Happened about 48 hrs earlier than I expected.

ArkRoyal wrote: Anch: Gough was the son of the Commonwealth Solicitor General, Kerr on the other hand, was the son of a boiler maker. Gough went to grammer school, Kerr to a high school. Both were long standing members of the ALP, and of course, Gough appointted Kerr as the GG.

Yes, and its worth mentioning that Kerr represented the Unions almost his entire time as Lawyer before being appointed to the NSW Supreme Court.

jackspratt wrote: You are re-living early 60s values, Leather.

It was only a decade later that a GG shagged a whole government, and parliamentary democracy along with it.

What a load of BS about 1960s values, the vast majority of people still reckon doing the dirty on your Mrs is a dog act. And the polls support that with 65 % wanting Joyce gone.

So the bonking beetroot is gone. Has Vicki Campion been to OPSM lately?

Goneski, didn't have the bottle to face the leadership challenge next Monday, clearly got the phone call the numbers had collapsed.

Thank goodness, now hopefully we won't have this rubbish thrown around on the media any more. There are so many other more important things to focus on.

mikeh wrote: Thank goodness, now hopefully we won't have this rubbish thrown around on the media any more. There are so many other more important things to focus on.

mikeh this has a lot more legs to run yet. It has always been whether there has been a breach of the ministerial code of conduct. I suspect there will also be a plethora of fois relalting to expenditure claims.

What he did and to whom apart from its breathtaking hypocrisy was never the issue.

The question is whether MT can survive

swan42 wrote:

mikeh wrote: Thank goodness, now hopefully we won't have this rubbish thrown around on the media any more. There are so many other more important things to focus on.

mikeh this has a lot more legs to run yet. It has always been whether there has been a breach of the ministerial code of conduct. I suspect there will also be a plethora of fois relalting to expenditure claims.

What he did and to whom apart from its breathtaking hypocrisy was never the issue.

I get that Swan42 and of course it is important to sort it out but I would prefer key issues such as the bridging the gap report, Tax reform, Climate change, Power, immigration, jobs etc to be highlighted in the public forum rather than listening to Barnaby making excuses or Abbott spitting out bile at Turnbull or who the next pollie is going to fall foul of section 44 of the constitution...... give me patience.