TOPIC:

Interesting to note that Eyres & Murray shared the hit out honours with Seaby & Andrews.

Hit outs were 46 a piece with Eyres 27 & Murray 18 with Chance having 1 vs Seaby 32 & Andrews 14. Also did as much around the ground as the Claremont pair.

Eyres is improving each week and he & Murray are providing a fair share of it for our midfield. Over time I think these 2 will turn into a formidable ruck combination.

Our midfield continues to work hard with Ali Smith, O'Sullivan & Hodge giving us plenty of drive, they are so hard at it.

O'Sullivan challenged yesterday at 3/4 time and responded accordingly.

Meat balls, close to best on ground, his reading of the play is sensational. How the hell he was playing reserves at Werribee has got me beat. Our intelligence on him was spot on and he has been a valuable addition to the side. He is as tall as most forwards in the competition but runs all day.

Nice to have Busher back, he will be better for the run and showed his versatility by going back in the second half when we were without Kane.

Chance continues to rack up the possessions but he had some awful clangers which I'm sure he would rather forget.

Just a few mistakes under pressure probably was the difference in the end despite there being a separate rule book for Claremont. They really do get some soft touches.

Well done guys, 2 weeks to get back on the park and hopefully a bounce back against Subi.

smokey wrote: There was a whisper at halftime that Chance was racially vilified in that incident, hence the ball was thrown at the Claremont player which in turn caused the first 50m penalty, then a second 50m penalty for complaining.
When he came to the bench Chance was really pumped.

what's the point being all pumped when you are coming off the ground?..... didn't realise Chance was relieving his teenage days?.....seems like life in the AFL was some what of a cocoon for the guy in the terms of banter then......surely in the heat of the battle in front of bigger audiences, playing in more important games, Chance has heard worse....surely?.....

Hey Freezing, Who do you go for in the WAFL?

Time For a Flag wrote: Hey Freezing, Who do you go for in the WAFL?

Good question TFAF , I have this one covered for you. Freezing is a Swans supporter,. It took me a wee bit of time to figure out who he supported but after reading all of his post but it finely clicked. Good old Black and Whites .

Time For a Flag wrote: Hey Freezing, Who do you go for in the WAFL?

Freezer and his mate btb are both east freo followers as supporters probably not the right description......... Oh and anyone playing against Perth!

"There was a whisper at halftime that Chance was racially vilified in that incident, hence the ball was thrown at the Claremont player which in turn caused the first 50m penalty, then a second 50m penalty for complaining"

DO ME A FAVOUR!!

Do you REALLY think that in this day and age anyone at the CFC would be so stupid as to racially vilify anyone??? I was sitting right where that happened and nothing was said. Bateman suffers from BIGMANAFL syndrome and thinks he is way beyond the WAFL. The first 50 was awarded because he threw the ball at the Claremont players head the second was because he said F OFF to the ump.

Tigeriffic wrote: "There was a whisper at halftime that Chance was racially vilified in that incident, hence the ball was thrown at the Claremont player which in turn caused the first 50m penalty, then a second 50m penalty for complaining"

DO ME A FAVOUR!!

Do you REALLY think that in this day and age anyone at the CFC would be so stupid as to racially vilify anyone??? I was sitting right where that happened and nothing was said. Bateman suffers from BIGMANAFL syndrome and thinks he is way beyond the WAFL. The first 50 was awarded because he threw the ball at the Claremont players head the second was because he said F OFF to the ump.

You must of been one of those players eh, otherwise i fail to see how a spectator can hear what is said on the ground between players, stop making shit up.

Because dhead it happened over the boundary line were u at the game? obviously not and the game wasn't at the MCG in front of 80,000 people there were about 15 people there so yes you can hear things.

Lucifer wrote:

Time For a Flag wrote: Hey Freezing, Who do you go for in the WAFL?

Freezer and his mate btb are both east freo followers as supporters probably not the right description......... Oh and anyone playing against Perth!

cheers for that Lucifer.....just a question mate?.....why did Chance lose his rag....senior player with 200 games of AFL experience.....PFC role model and all....and why was he 'pumped' coming off the ground, instead of being 'pumped' going on to the ground.....are you happy with Chance's actions?.....

TFAF, I'm a WAFL follower and an EF supporter.....just asked a question about Chance's actions....why are some of you Perth fans so sensitive when a someone asks a question or has a different point of view?....you boys don't mind questioning the footy ability of the likes of Duffy, Elari, Rogers....yet get all in a huff when I question Chances actions?.....

Peter North wrote:

Tigeriffic wrote: "There was a whisper at halftime that Chance was racially vilified in that incident, hence the ball was thrown at the Claremont player which in turn caused the first 50m penalty, then a second 50m penalty for complaining"

DO ME A FAVOUR!!

Do you REALLY think that in this day and age anyone at the CFC would be so stupid as to racially vilify anyone??? I was sitting right where that happened and nothing was said. Bateman suffers from BIGMANAFL syndrome and thinks he is way beyond the WAFL. The first 50 was awarded because he threw the ball at the Claremont players head the second was because he said F OFF to the ump.

You must of been one of those players eh, otherwise i fail to see how a spectator can hear what is said on the ground between players, stop making shit up.

As for the spectators, what was all the disgusting abuse leveled at the Claremont officials supposed to achieve?