TOPIC:

That post is partly based on stats and from having watched the game a little earlier in the season. I'm not actually certain what position those boys play for Swans. I included them because they didn't get a mention in the best players, but on reading their dream team rankings thought they deserved some praise.

interesting that you say a team:
"looked more physically mature at times played like boys against men"

and made that comment about a game that you say you did not attend.

I am interested to know how you believe someone could look physically mature when you are only looking at their stats but each to their own.

I have seen Swans colts twice this year. It was the case against Subi also we are just to small. Speaking to our colts coach he says we just can't find any big kids.

yeh, and i'm sure you havnt been to bassendean this year either

MarkOlsen wrote:

Larry Bird wrote: Daniels and Gillard impressed me last week against Swans. My thoughts where that Swans looked more physically mature at times they played like men against boys. East Perth limited the damage in the second half but I feel Swans eased up a fraction. In the young Royals defence they missed the grunt of Decampo and Wright. Interesting thoughts on #30 DW he is very easily distracted by some push and shove then he is basically a spectator.

Love your work MO although we all knew before that evidence that Dicky Bird was a complete fraud ..much like his football club!

looks like LB won't be getting Bassendean at all then this year MO, unless 42 comes up with that salary cap breaching quote he reckons LB made....

yeah true MO I shouldn't worry what you SD fans think, say and act...just as much as you SD boys shouldn't worry about what us folk on here think, say and act negatively towards the SDFC.....

Evidence yes that's a sticking point. I think my $1000 is safe.

LB on behalf of Telethon and Vinnies thank you for your $500.

LB this is your quore:

From my understanding Swans where (sic) ahead of the Salary Cap at half way.

So we have established you were the author of the above quote.

We have established that you were talking about Swan Districts Football Club.

We have established that you were talking about the 2014 season.

We have established that you asserted Swans were ahead of the Salary Cap.

It has been established that there is no provision that there is any pro rata of Salary Cap. Therefore, there are three states at ANY POINT IN TIME: you have spent less than your Salary Cap; you have spent your Salary Cap; or you have spent more than your Salary Cap. This means that "at half way" part of the quote is meaningless and superfluous to establishing the meaning of your comment.

Finally, it has been established that Swan Districts in 2014 was not sanctioned by the WAFC for any Salary Cap breach in 22014.

quod erat demonstrandum

Once again on behalf of Telethon thank you for your donation of $500 and on behalf of Vinnies thank you for your donation of $500.

I can't wait for the next instalment of this....
The shearer v the lawyer

42....where does LB say SD were ahead of the salary cap at half way?....all I understand from that sentence is where they were........could be a long night as singha rightly indicates......