TOPIC:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

swan42 wrote: BH Who won between Djokovic and Kyrgios?

I couldnt give a rats fat clacker who won 42....probably sledged the poor Joker to tears no doubt!

Not sure about that. Perhaps he asked Djokovic how he managed to avoid immediate disqualification and only an $8,000 fine after he hit a ball into the crowd and hit a spectator in a tournament earlier this year.

For all those who are interested in his progress: Kyrgios defeated Djokovic 7--6 (11-9), 7-5.

Still a knob

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

swan42 wrote: BH Who won between Djokovic and Kyrgios?

I couldnt give a rats fat clacker who won 42....probably sledged the poor Joker to tears no doubt!

Not sure about that. Perhaps he asked Djokovic how he managed to avoid immediate disqualification and only an $8,000 fine after he hit a ball into the crowd and hit a spectator in a tournament earlier this year.

For all those who are interested in his progress: Kyrgios defeated Djokovic 7--6 (11-9), 7-5.

Still a knob

Obviously you and BH won't change your mind. I also see no reason why I should change my opinion of how poorly behaved the Australian cricket team is in general (from the captain down).

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

swan42 wrote: BH Who won between Djokovic and Kyrgios?

I couldnt give a rats fat clacker who won 42....probably sledged the poor Joker to tears no doubt!

Not sure about that. Perhaps he asked Djokovic how he managed to avoid immediate disqualification and only an $8,000 fine after he hit a ball into the crowd and hit a spectator in a tournament earlier this year.

For all those who are interested in his progress: Kyrgios defeated Djokovic 7--6 (11-9), 7-5.

Still a knob

Obviously you and BH won't change your mind. I also see no reason why I should change my opinion of how poorly behaved the Australian cricket team is in general (from the captain down).

Start a new topic about it then and we can exchange arguments on that.

This is for the discussion of the two entitled brats that "represent" our country.

No I can happy to compare and contrast their behaviour and the Australian cricket team within this topic.

Mcbob wrote:


Start a new topic about it then and we can exchange arguments on that.

Why not the TRIFECTA's of losers.
Nick Krygios
Australian Labor Party
Fremantle Football Club

Leather Stops wrote:

Mcbob wrote:


Start a new topic about it then and we can exchange arguments on that.

Why not the TRIFECTA's of losers.
Nick Krygios
Australian Labor Party
Fremantle Football Club

Are you still bagging out the Marshes on twitter from behind you're keyboard ? Maybe Kyrgios should be added to the Essendon Football club as one of the biggest embarrassments in Australian sport.

Leather Stops wrote:

Mcbob wrote:


Start a new topic about it then and we can exchange arguments on that.

Why not the TRIFECTA's of losers.
Nick Krygios
Australian Labor Party
Fremantle Football Club

LS we have not had the following lead the Labor Party:

John Howard, Tony Abbott, Malcolm Turnbull, Bob Menzies or Colin Barnett.

yes but you had Gillard and Rudd and between them they make all of those you've named look like super stars

BC wrote: yes but you had Gillard and Rudd and between them they make all of those you've named look like super stars

Without wishing to divert from the appalling behaviour of the Australian cricket team. Not even close: John Howard was the most racist PM we have had for 80+ years. And as for his reprehensible comments attempting to rationalise Emperor Barnett getting into bed with One Nation is another damning indictment on him to go with Tampa, Children Overboard, Weapons of Mass Destruction. It speaks volumes that he was the first sitting PM to lose his seat since around 1929.

yes...but I repeat he is a super star compared to Gillard and Rudd.