TOPIC:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: 42 I believe the sports medicine term used for Tomic's condition at the time is....softness!

BH you have absolutely no idea of his physical condition at the time. Since you rival G Mitchell's knowledge of sports perhaps you can provide some information regarding the Australian cricket team's wicketkeeping position selection in the context of sledging?

He only has one job in life, play Tennis. If he cant handle it, physically or mentally, time to move on.

Wont be missed

You do realise that he wasn't the first play to retire in the middle of match nor will he be the last?

Theres are difference between injured and soft

And on what basis are you able to determine which it was?

Attitude and History.

As I suspected no basis at all.

No based on Attitude and History.

To repeat you have absolutely no basis to determine whether he was incapacitated or not at the end of the first set.

He was incapacitated by his soft cock nature.

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: 42 I believe the sports medicine term used for Tomic's condition at the time is....softness!

BH you have absolutely no idea of his physical condition at the time. Since you rival G Mitchell's knowledge of sports perhaps you can provide some information regarding the Australian cricket team's wicketkeeping position selection in the context of sledging?

He only has one job in life, play Tennis. If he cant handle it, physically or mentally, time to move on.

Wont be missed

You do realise that he wasn't the first play to retire in the middle of match nor will he be the last?

Theres are difference between injured and soft

And on what basis are you able to determine which it was?

Attitude and History.

As I suspected no basis at all.

No based on Attitude and History.

To repeat you have absolutely no basis to determine whether he was incapacitated or not at the end of the first set.

He was incapacitated by his soft cock nature.

Pathetic comment.

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote: He was incapacitated by his soft cock nature.

Pathetic comment.

Doesnt change the truth.

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote: He was incapacitated by his soft cock nature.

Pathetic comment.

Doesnt change the truth.

Sorry it had to be said: "you can't handle the truth".

Apparently you are as good as North Korea: they can diagnose cause of death without an autopsy.

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: 42 I believe the sports medicine term used for Tomic's condition at the time is....softness!

BH you have absolutely no idea of his physical condition at the time. Since you rival G Mitchell's knowledge of sports perhaps you can provide some information regarding the Australian cricket team's wicketkeeping position selection in the context of sledging?

He only has one job in life, play Tennis. If he cant handle it, physically or mentally, time to move on.

Wont be missed

You do realise that he wasn't the first play to retire in the middle of match nor will he be the last?

Theres are difference between injured and soft

And on what basis are you able to determine which it was?

Well seeing as tho he played doubles later in that same day it certainly isn't the injured option!

Beasley Hutton wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: 42 I believe the sports medicine term used for Tomic's condition at the time is....softness!

BH you have absolutely no idea of his physical condition at the time. Since you rival G Mitchell's knowledge of sports perhaps you can provide some information regarding the Australian cricket team's wicketkeeping position selection in the context of sledging?

He only has one job in life, play Tennis. If he cant handle it, physically or mentally, time to move on.

Wont be missed

You do realise that he wasn't the first play to retire in the middle of match nor will he be the last?

Theres are difference between injured and soft

And on what basis are you able to determine which it was?

Well seeing as tho he played doubles later in that same day it certainly isn't the injured option!

Oh BH so misguided. Playing doubles is SO MUCH EASIER from a physical perspective than doubles. I believe his reason for stopping after the first set was due to heat stress or similar. That can be resolved and it is no miracle that subsequently he was able to play doubles.

PS answer your message thanks.

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Mcbob wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: 42 I believe the sports medicine term used for Tomic's condition at the time is....softness!

BH you have absolutely no idea of his physical condition at the time. Since you rival G Mitchell's knowledge of sports perhaps you can provide some information regarding the Australian cricket team's wicketkeeping position selection in the context of sledging?

He only has one job in life, play Tennis. If he cant handle it, physically or mentally, time to move on.

Wont be missed

You do realise that he wasn't the first play to retire in the middle of match nor will he be the last?

Theres are difference between injured and soft

And on what basis are you able to determine which it was?

Well seeing as tho he played doubles later in that same day it certainly isn't the injured option!

Oh BH so misguided. Playing doubles is SO MUCH EASIER from a physical perspective than doubles. I believe his reason for stopping after the first set was due to heat stress or similar. That can be resolved and it is no miracle that subsequently he was able to play doubles.

PS answer your message thanks.

There you go. Took the easier option = Soft cock.

BH Who won between Djokovic and Kyrgios?

swan42 wrote: BH Who won between Djokovic and Kyrgios?

I couldnt give a rats fat clacker who won 42....probably sledged the poor Joker to tears no doubt!

Beasley Hutton wrote:

swan42 wrote: BH Who won between Djokovic and Kyrgios?

I couldnt give a rats fat clacker who won 42....probably sledged the poor Joker to tears no doubt!

Not sure about that. Perhaps he asked Djokovic how he managed to avoid immediate disqualification and only an $8,000 fine after he hit a ball into the crowd and hit a spectator in a tournament earlier this year.

For all those who are interested in his progress: Kyrgios defeated Djokovic 7--6 (11-9), 7-5.