TOPIC:

BC wrote:
DD...gremar got very personal and went beyond the realms of banter and a bit of chit stirring. Outer on the other hand was just trying to have a bit of fun...even to a card carrying moron such as yourself should be able to see there is a difference. the insinuation that Subi is doing something under the table in relation to the salary cap which is what posters on here are inferring when using the term $alaryaco and $ubi etc is not only offensive to Subi supporters but also slanderous and couold be remedied at law. Why that has been allowed to continue when a tongue in cheek post from outer is not is simply mind boggling.

the other thing which I find confusing is that Dirty Weekender is the moderator of the SD thread and he obviously didn't find it crossing the line as he actually contributed to it...and fair enough too.

Well there you go showing what a hypocrite you are. Enough said.

yep...apologies DD as that wasn't called for on my part but this thing has got up my nose. it appears posters can say whatever they like against whomever they like on here as long as it's not directed at the protected bogan species. I thought under new management things might change but clearly not.

Some posters need to remember this isn't the eighties what you think is harmless may not be to some, do any of you visit other forums I can assure you the dribble that gets posted on here wouldn't be allowed I ask again what makes you so special that this site should be treated differently., some of you are still living in caves by the sounds of it.

Everyone just wants consistency that's all.....whilst obviously Outer upset a few of the SD boys with a bit of apparent disrespectful chit chat about SD finishing 9th this year and got banned for doing so......I myself got upset at the disrespectful comments made by a few of the SD boys made each week for when they lost most week yet no warnings were given or bans imposed....this went on for nearly 22 weeks......well enough is enough....

Disrespectful comments such as ....".injury to this person" ".injury to that person"...".the umps gave away this free kick and that free kick", " we lost Davis n Broad to the draft" were used constantly each week by the SD boys when they lost.....I find such excuses disrespectful for the winning team..........no excuses, a loss is a loss regardless of injury or free kicks or player losses........if TOSG gets banned for a day or two of wooden spoon mickey taking, then surely 22 weeks of disrespecting an opposition win is just as punishable......consistency is all that is asked.....sadly TOSG banning is another example of how PC todays society has become.....it's footy come end of the day.....

Tears from freezin, funny stuff
This is one of the funnier things to happen and read about in this forum.

if we wanted a sanitized, PC, non-controversial chat site I'd join the Mormon Tabernacle Choir working group. Sites like this generally replicate the banter that goes on at the ground where good natured chit stirring is the order of the day. Christ...EP and WP turned the wooden spoon thing into an art form culminating in the real article getting thrown one day. If I was to crystal ball a bit I can see this site spiralling down to being the forum for half a dozen self indulgent, delusional SD supporters all patting each other on the back on how good their team is even though they're coming last. When we start banning the likes of outer and Bazza for making a few comments which upset an overly sensitive minority then this site is doomed if it's not already. Some on here need to get over themselves and treat this for what it is.

BC wrote: if we wanted a sanitized, PC, non-controversial chat site I'd join the Mormon Tabernacle Choir working group. Sites like this generally replicate the banter that goes on at the ground where good natured chit stirring is the order of the day. Christ...EP and WP turned the wooden spoon thing into an art form culminating in the real article getting thrown one day. If I was to crystal ball a bit I can see this site spiralling down to being the forum for half a dozen self indulgent, delusional SD supporters all patting each other on the back on how good their team is even though they're coming last. When we start banning the likes of outer and Bazza for making a few comments which upset an overly sensitive minority then this site is doomed if it's not already. Some on here need to get over themselves and treat this for what it is.

On the contrary there would be more posters if they weren't here didn't you read my post? check out the other forums they're actually policed more than Ozfooty, if there's one reason for lack of posters all you have to do is look at the demographic most are WAFL supporters and where is the WAFL interest at the minute there's your answer.

Geez, we really have become a society of princesses haven't we?
Looks as though we are now, not allowed to take the mick out of a bottom side. Hope this goes for the people that use the derogatory terms such as "gummies", "wet toast", "the yellers", and " flat track bullies" etc, etc. No more bogun mentions of how the Sharks haven't won a flag this new century. Those terms offend me, so I need to make a complaint . Trouble is, I'm not not allowed to call the Dorks the Dorks any more. Oh well Fremantle is a lovely team and have been so unlucky this year.

Really honestly if anyone thinks Theouterseagull contributed anything worthwhile on the Swans board I find that amazing in itself. The problem I had with it was firstly is it shouldn't have been allowed to sit there, it should have been removed immediately.

Secondly, it eventually drifted to other worthwhile discussions about player retirements, under the heading of "WOODEN SPOONERS 2016". I don't think that topic and the author of it deserved to remain there.

Since appointing moderators for each club has there been any topics posted by non Subi supporters on the Subiaco board having a go at Subiaco FC? Answer is no because they know it wouldn't last long and fair enough, Subiaco supporters shouldn't have to put up with it on their board no matter what others might think. It works both ways and I think that is displaying consistency and not treating one poster different from another or one club differently to another.

Hopefully that explains things a little more clearly.

The ban stays - the individual did not heed the request to desist , instead immediately tried to repost an identical thread topic

Deliberate act therefore a deliberate penalty

End of story move on folks