TOPIC:

since the original thread has been culled from the bogan's site I would like to make my feelings known on outer being banned for a bit of chit stirring with the SD faithful. have we all become so sensitive and precious that a bit of banter could cause some readers to take exception so much so that they ask for a thread to be taken down and it's initiator banned? that is absolute rubbish as far as I'm concerned. Christ, we're all adults and if you don't like something that has been posted don't follow that thread and ignore it.

Oz Admin...I demand that the next time someone uses a term which is derogatory towards my team including but not limited to salaryiaco, $ubi, $$$subiaco or anything even remotely similar that poster is warned and then banned if they continue to make accusations around the Subi Footy Club. I would also hope that supporters of Peel and East Perth ask likewise if WART and FART are posted. In addition, I would like to see any negative comments towards other things I support like the Libs and Malcolm Turnbull, German cars, offshore processing of refugees and so on to receive similar treatment as I also find them offensive.

...and before you even think about deleting this topic, I think it's important for the future of this site that it's posters have their say on what is reasonable to post on here and what is not...so this is not a bit of stirring on my part, it's a genuine attempt to get some lines in the sand as I think your banning of outer and the reasons behind it are crap.

I'll await your response.

Having also been subject to a Ban in the past, I echo BCs, comments, I know posting this could end up in me facing another ban, but I feel that this has now gone over the top.

Since then I have earnestly tried to restrain my posts to the point of out and out sterile boredom.

Whats really a concern is what appears to be one sector of this online commumity being subject to one rule and others having a whole other set.

Grassy wrote: Hey BC,we all have a lend from time to time.

But come on,Outer was laying it on pretty thick and Bazza wasn't too far behind him.

But good luck,if you feel your case warrants arguing.

What exactly was laying it on thick . ?

Give me a break, its a long held wafl tradition to give a wooden spooner curry.

Bazza wrote:

Grassy wrote: Hey BC,we all have a lend from time to time.

But come on,Outer was laying it on pretty thick and Bazza wasn't too far behind him.

But good luck,if you feel your case warrants arguing.

What exactly was laying it on thick . ?

Give me a break, its a long held wafl tradition to give a wooden spooner curry.

You're one of the biggest cancers on this site and probably one of the reasons FG went down hill, should of been banned altogether cut from the same cloth as Gremar and Sffc4eva

Grassy wrote: Try a little harder.You've been dishing it out as well,buddy.Possibly worse than Outer!

Like what exactly,? ...your not bad a having a crack at one and all yourself...

Peter North wrote:

Bazza wrote:

Grassy wrote: Hey BC,we all have a lend from time to time.

But come on,Outer was laying it on pretty thick and Bazza wasn't too far behind him.

But good luck,if you feel your case warrants arguing.

What exactly was laying it on thick . ?

Give me a break, its a long held wafl tradition to give a wooden spooner curry.

You're one of the biggest cancers on this site and probably one of the reasons FG went down hill, should of been banned altogether cut from the same cloth as Gremar and Sffc4eva

Really, people like you are killing this site...As BC says with sterile boredom

Grassy wrote: Bazza,cut the Crap!

You were at it on Perth's Board and your's slagging off LATHLAIN PARK!

Even Southerner got tired of it.

A joke or three's fine,but you were just piling it on.

And no,I didn't report any of it to anyone.But seeing you copping it back,what do you expect?

Was that pre or post ban? Lathlain Park was that on the Perth site or sffc thread?

BC wrote: since the original thread has been culled from the bogan's site I would like to make my feelings known on outer being banned for a bit of chit stirring with the SD faithful. have we all become so sensitive and precious that a bit of banter could cause some readers to take exception so much so that they ask for a thread to be taken down and it's initiator banned? that is absolute rubbish as far as I'm concerned. Christ, we're all adults and if you don't like something that has been posted don't follow that thread and ignore it.

Oz Admin...I demand that the next time someone uses a term which is derogatory towards my team including but not limited to salaryiaco, $ubi, $$$subiaco or anything even remotely similar that poster is warned and then banned if they continue to make accusations around the Subi Footy Club. I would also hope that supporters of Peel and East Perth ask likewise if WART and FART are posted. In addition, I would like to see any negative comments towards other things I support like the Libs and Malcolm Turnbull, German cars, offshore processing of refugees and so on to receive similar treatment as I also find them offensive.

...and before you even think about deleting this topic, I think it's important for the future of this site that it's posters have their say on what is reasonable to post on here and what is not...so this is not a bit of stirring on my part, it's a genuine attempt to get some lines in the sand as I think your banning of outer and the reasons behind it are crap.

I'll await your response.

That's a bit rich coming from you BC. Seems to me it's just good banter except when it's directed at you or your club. I specifically recall when Gremar came back you were encouraging him and advising everyone else to toughen up but when Gremar added to to his top ten most hated on this site (and I thought it was quite funny by the way), you went off your trolley screaming for the moderator to ban this mongrel.

Now it's one of your own being banned for giving it to SD on their thread it's not fair. Boo hoo. And why would posters referring to Subiaco as $alaryaco $ubi be unfair? How fair is it that your club has such a massive financial advantage over the rest of the competition?

Seems to me you are the one that's a bit sensitive mate, of course not sensitive about one of your own giving it to SD or any other club on its knees both on the field and financially. No as long as Subi is winning premierships you and your lot are happy as Larry.

No doubt your club will be trying to lure Tropiano away from Perth. You are just never satisfied are you?

BC the Swans supporters gave TOSG his own Swans thread.Where he was free to speak his mind.For some reason we all stop using that thread.

DD wrote:

BC wrote: since the original thread has been culled from the bogan's site I would like to make my feelings known on outer being banned for a bit of chit stirring with the SD faithful. have we all become so sensitive and precious that a bit of banter could cause some readers to take exception so much so that they ask for a thread to be taken down and it's initiator banned? that is absolute rubbish as far as I'm concerned. Christ, we're all adults and if you don't like something that has been posted don't follow that thread and ignore it.

Oz Admin...I demand that the next time someone uses a term which is derogatory towards my team including but not limited to salaryiaco, $ubi, $$$subiaco or anything even remotely similar that poster is warned and then banned if they continue to make accusations around the Subi Footy Club. I would also hope that supporters of Peel and East Perth ask likewise if WART and FART are posted. In addition, I would like to see any negative comments towards other things I support like the Libs and Malcolm Turnbull, German cars, offshore processing of refugees and so on to receive similar treatment as I also find them offensive.

...and before you even think about deleting this topic, I think it's important for the future of this site that it's posters have their say on what is reasonable to post on here and what is not...so this is not a bit of stirring on my part, it's a genuine attempt to get some lines in the sand as I think your banning of outer and the reasons behind it are crap.

I'll await your response.

That's a bit rich coming from you BC. Seems to me it's just good banter except when it's directed at you or your club. I specifically recall when Gremar came back you were encouraging him and advising everyone else to toughen up but when Gremar added to to his top ten most hated on this site (and I thought it was quite funny by the way), you went off your trolley screaming for the moderator to ban this mongrel.

Now it's one of your own being banned for giving it to SD on their thread it's not fair. Boo hoo. And why would posters referring to Subiaco as $alaryaco $ubi be unfair? How fair is it that your club has such a massive financial advantage over the rest of the competition?

Seems to me you are the one that's a bit sensitive mate, of course not sensitive about one of your own giving it to SD or any other club on its knees both on the field and financially. No as long as Subi is winning premierships you and your lot are happy as Larry.

No doubt your club will be trying to lure Tropiano away from Perth. You are just never satisfied are you?

DD...gremar got very personal and went beyond the realms of banter and a bit of chit stirring. Outer on the other hand was just trying to have a bit of fun...even to a card carrying moron such as yourself should be able to see there is a difference. the insinuation that Subi is doing something under the table in relation to the salary cap which is what posters on here are inferring when using the term $alaryaco and $ubi etc is not only offensive to Subi supporters but also slanderous and couold be remedied at law. Why that has been allowed to continue when a tongue in cheek post from outer is not is simply mind boggling.

the other thing which I find confusing is that Dirty Weekender is the moderator of the SD thread and he obviously didn't find it crossing the line as he actually contributed to it...and fair enough too.