TOPIC:

Swandog wrote:

Bazza wrote:

Swandog wrote:

Bazza wrote:

DG wrote:

Those figures are pretty darn good tbh, to get 66,000 people watching a wafl prelim and then 80k the GF is a hell of a lot more than I expected.

If the mighty black and whites were in the GF then it would have been 150k make no mistake!!

Really, thats odd because not a single SD game made it into the top 3 viewer wise, your top was 32k one of which was v us. Didnt even manage to get 35k or more. SD did however feature in the equal second lowest viewed games at just 20k ..150k in your bong induced wet dreams maybe fella.

That's because SD fans actually attend games mate!

This thread is about TV ratings you numpty, you claimed 150K would be watching..??WTF..are you drinking that bong water now?

BTw, your attendances are way down the list as well.

Mr AFL wrote: Perth games didn't seem to do to bad.

Yep did well, put SD to shame. More Perth interest than SD clearly.

Bazza wrote:

Swandog wrote:

Bazza wrote:

Swandog wrote:

Bazza wrote:

DG wrote:

Those figures are pretty darn good tbh, to get 66,000 people watching a wafl prelim and then 80k the GF is a hell of a lot more than I expected.

If the mighty black and whites were in the GF then it would have been 150k make no mistake!!

Really, thats odd because not a single SD game made it into the top 3 viewer wise, your top was 32k one of which was v us. Didnt even manage to get 35k or more. SD did however feature in the equal second lowest viewed games at just 20k ..150k in your bong induced wet dreams maybe fella.

That's because SD fans actually attend games mate!

This thread is about TV ratings you numpty, you claimed 150K would be watching..??WTF..are you drinking that bong water now?

BTw, your attendances are way down the list as well.

A certain someone has been helping themselves to the drug squads confiscated items again I see!