TOPIC:

Leedy wrote:

Larry Bird wrote: A little tongue in cheek DG, having said that if Subi fielded 2 league sides and split their talent up I think both teams would go better than some other clubs. I still get a chuckle when WAFL supporters squeal about inequality, that is what the comp has been based on for decades.

I have no doubt it has been going on for decades LB, the difference back in the day was income for all clubs was fair and equitable. The work put in determined your revenue, sponsors, bar and functions etc. Fuck, if we had the board we have today in the 80s, we would have been in $ubi's league

Disagree Leedy, Subi may be flush these days but for decades it was never fair or equitable, we were not permitted to have a license due to the WANFL having a license for their premises at Subi oval plus we never had proper clubrooms until the early 1970's and have never had the luxury of watching the game from the bar like all other clubs until we moved to Leederville, no wonder we never attracted members or supporters when other clubs has such superior facilities, uneven playing field then as it is perceived to be now. Those are the facts.

demons2013 wrote: Peel wouldnt have won a game without the alignment.

East Perth would have missed out too

Senior Seagull wrote:

Leedy wrote:

Larry Bird wrote: A little tongue in cheek DG, having said that if Subi fielded 2 league sides and split their talent up I think both teams would go better than some other clubs. I still get a chuckle when WAFL supporters squeal about inequality, that is what the comp has been based on for decades.

I have no doubt it has been going on for decades LB, the difference back in the day was income for all clubs was fair and equitable. The work put in determined your revenue, sponsors, bar and functions etc. Fuck, if we had the board we have today in the 80s, we would have been in $ubi's league

Disagree Leedy, Subi may be flush these days but for decades it was never fair or equitable, we were not permitted to have a license due to the WANFL having a license for their premises at Subi oval plus we never had proper clubrooms until the early 1970's and have never had the luxury of watching the game from the bar like all other clubs until we moved to Leederville, no wonder we never attracted members or supporters when other clubs has such superior facilities, uneven playing field then as it is perceived to be now. Those are the facts.

Boo friggin hoo!!!!!!!!!!!!

What would you base that assumption on Swandog.

It was once said (I don't know who by)that if all of the money in the world was divided up evenly between all, the people who had it to start with, would end up with it again. Go Subi.

Senior Seagull wrote:

Leedy wrote:

Larry Bird wrote: A little tongue in cheek DG, having said that if Subi fielded 2 league sides and split their talent up I think both teams would go better than some other clubs. I still get a chuckle when WAFL supporters squeal about inequality, that is what the comp has been based on for decades.

I have no doubt it has been going on for decades LB, the difference back in the day was income for all clubs was fair and equitable. The work put in determined your revenue, sponsors, bar and functions etc. Fuck, if we had the board we have today in the 80s, we would have been in $ubi's league

Disagree Leedy, Subi may be flush these days but for decades it was never fair or equitable, we were not permitted to have a license due to the WANFL having a license for their premises at Subi oval plus we never had proper clubrooms until the early 1970's and have never had the luxury of watching the game from the bar like all other clubs until we moved to Leederville, no wonder we never attracted members or supporters when other clubs has such superior facilities, uneven playing field then as it is perceived to be now. Those are the facts.

Thats fine SS, but Im fairly confident that the tax payer payed for Subi Oval and all the other WAFL grounds, why do they get an extensive benefit from it still to this day ? The burning question is how have WAFC kept the salary rorting swept under the carpet for as long as it has? Randall me thinks!!!

DG wrote: Mabye one club, & that's if we had no injury's for the whole season Larry. Yep, so do I. Leedy you mean back when we had no social income for half a century? C'mon mate you lot have been kissed on the dick with zones & you still manage to fk it up I mean geez you had a big young bloke who cost you nothing & is twice as good as lourey & keitel put together & next year he'll probably be playing along side Boland & Yaz, that's if Yaz knee not gone thanks to your mate's reckless brain fade sling...

Do you mean Stockley or JD's boy ?

Swandog wrote:

demons2013 wrote: Peel wouldnt have won a game without the alignment.

East Perth would have missed out too

And swandog I would have been quite happy with that on the proviso that rather than try to buy players as we have in the past we played our ressies and colts and gave them the chance.

I like to win but I like it even more to see EP players playing for EP not a team purchased!

Leedy wrote:

DG wrote: Mabye one club, & that's if we had no injury's for the whole season Larry. Yep, so do I. Leedy you mean back when we had no social income for half a century? C'mon mate you lot have been kissed on the dick with zones & you still manage to fk it up I mean geez you had a big young bloke who cost you nothing & is twice as good as lourey & keitel put together & next year he'll probably be playing along side Boland & Yaz, that's if Yaz knee not gone thanks to your mate's reckless brain fade sling...

Do you mean Stockley or JD's boy ?

JD's boy of course

If the alignment goes on for another 15 years with EastPerth and Peel.Like 2015 they did not win the flag,but the normal team football cycle wont be there imo.Rebuild a side then challenge for the finals then have a tilt at the premiership then start all over again.Does the alignment guarantee finals every year?