TOPIC:

Good to see my attempt of humour tickled your fancy.

about as funny as the EP supporter the other week who told me the eagles players have no impact on their team

Beasley Hutton wrote:

Barney wrote: Have I hurt little diddums feelings? Need a tissue darling?

Jeepers some of you Swans supporters are a little touchy feely. Things go against you and the toys are out of the cot and the bottom lip starts to quiver.

No not at all Barney I just find it hilarious how you jump to the defence of the calamity cops that are the WAFC every time someone has a crack at them ..anyone would think you are very chummy to a few of them at Roberts Rd!

To do this you chose to single out a post in which I am critical about the WAFC and their entry price for the GF? Very compeling argument.

Larry Bird wrote: In defence of Dickie Turner he is an absolute gentleman and a good businessman. He is not the sort of guy to get drawn into a slanging match with a bloke that is barely able to string a sentence together. Not that Jako doesn't reflect the view of many of us, but it's a long lonely walk to the back of Jacko's head. At least he has the bottle to stand up and have an opinion I suppose. Turner inherited a basket case.

hahaha farken hell geez well if GJ has some vacant space up top then you have pure catshit in that veteran centre-half-back skull of yours

You idiot

Barney wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote:

Barney wrote: Have I hurt little diddums feelings? Need a tissue darling?

Jeepers some of you Swans supporters are a little touchy feely. Things go against you and the toys are out of the cot and the bottom lip starts to quiver.

No not at all Barney I just find it hilarious how you jump to the defence of the calamity cops that are the WAFC every time someone has a crack at them ..anyone would think you are very chummy to a few of them at Roberts Rd!

To do this you chose to single out a post in which I am critical about the WAFC and their entry price for the GF? Very compeling argument.

About as compelling as making a claim that a club is over the salary cap and then not providing any proof whatsoever of said claim when challenged!

I don't know, seems pretty compelling considering you are still worried about it three months later.

Although I am thrilled you remember some of my previous work, shows I am making a difference. For example I would have no hope remembering or telling the difference between posts from Beasley Hutton or Mark Olsen from three months ago. But you remember me and that's super.

Barney wrote: I don't know, seems pretty compelling considering you are still worried about it three months later.

Although I am thrilled you remember some of my previous work, shows I am making a difference. For example I would have no hope remembering or telling the difference between posts from Beasley Hutton or Mark Olsen from three months ago. But you remember me and that's super.

As a general rule: the infamous are often well known.