TOPIC:

yep seems like the AFL has different interpretations to these things than the WAFL.

Wouldn't report you to the moderators Cardy. I normally laugh at your cartoons, just didn't like that particular one.

MarkOlsen wrote: Chaddy22 - last week you said i was wrong in relation to some information i posted and i asked you to provide the document the West and Dean Turner were talking about, as yet i have not seen that info provided..
am i still wrong or did i miss your post where you provided the info or posted that it was you and not me that was wrong ?

thanks..

NOBODY KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT NOT EVEN YOU AND NOT EVEN I.I QUOTED THE WAFL RULES AND REGULATIONS WHICH WAS AMENDED SEPTEMBER 2013 WHICH MEANS IT IS CURRENT AND WOULD APPLY TO ALL WAFL CLUBS.YOU CAN LABOR THE POINT BUT GO READ THE WAFL RULES.YOU DON'T NEED TO BE A LAWYER TO COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT HE WILL BE ABLE TO PLAY FOR EAST PERTH IF HE WISHED.IF THERE IS ANOTHER DOCUMENT THAT SAYS OTHERWISE I THINK TOM PERCY CAN CHALLENGE IT BECAUSE THIS BYLAW IS QUITE STRAIGHT FORWARD.SAYING THAT I THINK ADAM SELWOOD WILL BE COACHING NEXT YEAR. SO IT IS A MUTE POINT.

do you mean a moot point and why are you shouting ?

Dean Turner and the west were talking about something completely different to what you quoted..

and you keep saying i am wrong yet you dont know the difference between mute and moot..

good luck chaddy, you need it..

If that had been Mark Hutchings or Mellington who had done that on sunday would you have been as supportive of them playing?



Yes I would, I admire hard football and like to see great bumps especially when the player gets up and plays on!

A report or investigation should only happen when the player is injured and cannot continue, immediately or if an assessment is made and he has concussion, then the book should be thrown at the player involve!

WP Swans I don't care a fair bump that doesn't result in a serious injury should be a free kick if warranted and or play on!