TOPIC:

UNKA2 wrote:

swan42 wrote:

UNKA2 wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Grassy wrote: In Breaking News,discovered on the PerthNow News Site,Pauline Hanson's One Nation have done a preference Deal with the Liberal on the Eve of the Election,that could not only Derail Labor's Plans to Resume Government,but Destroy the age old partnership The Libs and Nationals had,when in Office.

Whatever Pauline said about the Government's Poor Performance appears to have flown out the Window,as she helps a Flaling Liberal Party,try and scrabble it's way to a 3rd Term of Office.

Whatever she said also about holding Bad Government to account,has also flown out the Window,as this is a Government that is begging to be thrown out of office after a bad 4 years,which included Broken Promises,Arrogant positioning on numerous issues and blowing a Mining Boom Bonanza up into a Blow Up Debt.

Congratulations Pauline!

Emperor Barnett will do anything to anyone in an attempt to stay on as Emperor. In stark contrast it is good to see that the ALP have not and will not exchange preferences with a party predicated on a base, racist agenda.

Onya Pauline, you put yer preferences where ya want love, ( not that i give a rats if they go to Colin or not) . Should the greens get more than 15 or so votes ( chuckle chuckle) where are their preferences going??

Unka2 three letters: D L P

Never heard of em. Anyway she resonates with a lot more people than the other mugs, people are sick of the 2 useless mobs we have at the mo. As i said 1/3 dont want labor or libs. How on earth BOTH parties can bang on about spending money when we are broke, is a bloody joke. Neither of em has the balls to say, we cant afford it, no $$$ promises until we have paid down some of the huge debt.

Never heard of the Democratic Labour Party?

Peter North wrote: I'll be voting One Nation, how is this news Paulines preferences were always going to the Libs any party aligned to the Greens can gagf.

PN how does Hanson rationalise her claim that she was going to hold the Government to account by preferencing Barnett's government?

UNKA2 wrote:

DD wrote: Well there goes any respect I had for Pauline Hanson. If she thinks she can muscle her way into politics in Western Australia, feed us bullshit telling us the people in WA she has spoken to are fed up with the high cost of living, the ice epidemic and rising electricity costs making out like she's going to make a difference, then jump into bed with the encumbant government of the last 8 years that has driven the state into a black hole of debt, then YOU ARE GOING LAST ON MY BALLOT PAPER PAULINE.

Hopefully it backfires big time on her ambitions and it has the effect of those who were going to vote liberal switch to Labor or the nationals and put the Libs and One Nation last.

As for Colin Barnett, the bloke is a slimy dog.

Who should she direct her preferences too then??

If she wants to bring about change and right what is wrong in this state then obviously she should be aligning her preferences with the Labor party. Pauline is not the sharpest tool in the shed but I thought the woman had an ounce of commonsense.

DD wrote:

UNKA2 wrote:

DD wrote: Well there goes any respect I had for Pauline Hanson. If she thinks she can muscle her way into politics in Western Australia, feed us bullshit telling us the people in WA she has spoken to are fed up with the high cost of living, the ice epidemic and rising electricity costs making out like she's going to make a difference, then jump into bed with the encumbant government of the last 8 years that has driven the state into a black hole of debt, then YOU ARE GOING LAST ON MY BALLOT PAPER PAULINE.

Hopefully it backfires big time on her ambitions and it has the effect of those who were going to vote liberal switch to Labor or the nationals and put the Libs and One Nation last.

As for Colin Barnett, the bloke is a slimy dog.

Who should she direct her preferences too then??

If she wants to bring about change and right what is wrong in this state then obviously she should be aligning her preferences with the Labor party. Pauline is not the sharpest tool in the shed but I thought the woman had an ounce of commonsense.

Pauline Hanson's 1990s credo was: Australia is getting overrun by Asians.

Pauline Hanson's 2010s credo was: Australia is getting overrun by Muslims.

swan42 wrote:

DD wrote:

UNKA2 wrote:

DD wrote: Well there goes any respect I had for Pauline Hanson. If she thinks she can muscle her way into politics in Western Australia, feed us bullshit telling us the people in WA she has spoken to are fed up with the high cost of living, the ice epidemic and rising electricity costs making out like she's going to make a difference, then jump into bed with the encumbant government of the last 8 years that has driven the state into a black hole of debt, then YOU ARE GOING LAST ON MY BALLOT PAPER PAULINE.

Hopefully it backfires big time on her ambitions and it has the effect of those who were going to vote liberal switch to Labor or the nationals and put the Libs and One Nation last.

As for Colin Barnett, the bloke is a slimy dog.

Who should she direct her preferences too then??

If she wants to bring about change and right what is wrong in this state then obviously she should be aligning her preferences with the Labor party. Pauline is not the sharpest tool in the shed but I thought the woman had an ounce of commonsense.

Pauline Hanson's 1990s credo was: Australia is getting overrun by Asians.

Pauline Hanson's 2010s credo was: Australia is getting overrun by Muslims.

Perhaps what swung it for Pauline to jump in bed with the Libs was when Colin said "I don't believe the burka should be worn here". Is she that simple?

Lol Hanson and One Nation are as far right as it gets do posters in here really think she's going to side with the left and the social justi warriors of WA, Ipreferences were always going to the Libs no way Labor are going to pull back ten seats with One Nation preferences, I've got no doubt her supporters would be 100% behind this decision

Peter North wrote: Lol Hanson and One Nation are as far right as it gets do posters in here really think she's going to side with the left and the social justi warriors of WA, Ipreferences were always going to the Libs no way Labor are going to pull back ten seats with One Nation preferences, I've got no doubt her supporters would be 100% behind this decision

PN it is what the Liberals are doing in a desperate attempt to retain government.

swan42 wrote:

Peter North wrote: Lol Hanson and One Nation are as far right as it gets do posters in here really think she's going to side with the left and the social justi warriors of WA, Ipreferences were always going to the Libs no way Labor are going to pull back ten seats with One Nation preferences, I've got no doubt her supporters would be 100% behind this decision

PN it is what the Liberals are doing in a desperate attempt to retain government.

Here is a hypothetical fer ya Swan42, what ya reckon if it was say a 50/50 election, and Pauline said to Sneakers, tell ya what you help me and i will give me preferences to you so ya will get in??............ i dont think sneakers would be any different to Barnett, in that he would do ANYTHING to get the gig.

the best way to get Barnett is to vote for Barnett; there is no point votting ON in the lower house.

Grassy wrote:

UNKA2 wrote:

swan42 wrote:

Peter North wrote: Lol Hanson and One Nation are as far right as it gets do posters in here really think she's going to side with the left and the social justi warriors of WA, Ipreferences were always going to the Libs no way Labor are going to pull back ten seats with One Nation preferences, I've got no doubt her supporters would be 100% behind this decision

PN it is what the Liberals are doing in a desperate attempt to retain government.

Here is a hypothetical fer ya Swan42, what ya reckon if it was say a 50/50 election, and Pauline said to Sneakers, tell ya what you help me and i will give me preferences to you so ya will get in??............ i dont think sneakers would be any different to Barnett, in that he would do ANYTHING to get the gig.

Unka,I was laughing at McGowan's Claim about Governing in his own right or not at all.But I dare say,he'd go to the Greens if he needed them,not One Nation.

Entirely new Ball Game Now.McGowan and Co can Still Stump 'em,if he's Smart.I sometimes wonder,but there is a way,so simple it isn't funny.

So i will ask the same question to you Grass man, if Pauline gave her preferances to Labour under some deal GUARANTEEIN a victory for Mc Cowan, would he take it???