TOPIC:

The initial report was a joke.

hmmmm...Fyfe gets 2 weeks for an accidental head clash, McInnes gets off for a high hit which knocks a bloke clean out causing him to land awkwardly and break his ankle. It's a joke alright.

That Mcinnes is useless anyway, better of he plays BC

I'll take your word for it Falcon. btw...how's it going mate? we don't see you all that much on here these days?

Shock horror and associated amazement that an AFL listed player charged in the WAFL gets a free pass at the tribunal!! I'm sure the Claremont lad he polaxed will appreciate this decision while he hobbles around on his broken ankle and misses a huge chunk of his pre-season. If nothing else on this issue at least the tribunal has been pretty consistent.

To paraphrase Animal Farm, all players are equal but some are more equal than others.

Senior Seagull wrote: Shock horror and associated amazement that an AFL listed player charged in the WAFL gets a free pass at the tribunal!! I'm sure the Claremont lad he polaxed will appreciate this decision while he hobbles around on his broken ankle and misses a huge chunk of his pre-season. If nothing else on this issue at least the tribunal has been pretty consistent.

To paraphrase Animal Farm, all players are equal but some are more equal than others.

He is offered 2 weeks and the tribunal chairman gives him nothing. One if not both should be sacked.

S/s if only we could get the powerball numbers right as accurately as we can pick the tribunal findings!!!!

Statisically players from the G7 teams were more likely to be free to play after being reported during 2014. It is just the system and the way it is set up, nearly everyone gets off!

There is no East Perth
Pimped out by Whoreson
Soulless, homeless puppets

BC wrote: I'll take your word for it Falcon. btw...how's it going mate? we don't see you all that much on here these days?

Yeh good mate, getting ready for my other love to start..cricket!

To be honest this alignment think has turned me off a little and I have lost interest in the WAFL comp, but anyway good luck to Subi, you guys seem to be our only chance for a G7 flag this year..

swan42 wrote:

Senior Seagull wrote: Shock horror and associated amazement that an AFL listed player charged in the WAFL gets a free pass at the tribunal!! I'm sure the Claremont lad he polaxed will appreciate this decision while he hobbles around on his broken ankle and misses a huge chunk of his pre-season. If nothing else on this issue at least the tribunal has been pretty consistent.

To paraphrase Animal Farm, all players are equal but some are more equal than others.

He is offered 2 weeks and the tribunal chairman gives him nothing. One if not both should be sacked.

S/s if only we could get the powerball numbers right as accurately as we can pick the tribunal findings!!!!

Agreed, they usually give a longer penalty or the same if the offer is not accepted.