TOPIC:

we do...during the season we were north of 60% local from memory ....not as good as some but still within the points limitation.

As i have said before every WAFL club feels the Roth of this mob, these players get offers that cannot be matched by their original club, happens every year about this time, has happened again!
I am sure there is more to come.....G6 clubs hold on!

BC wrote: we do...during the season we were north of 60% local from memory ....not as good as some but still within the points limitation.

Absolute BS BC you where nowhere near 60%....
8 of the 22 in GF side where Subiaco local zone talent at an appalling 36%...
Even being generous enough to include Stevenson from West Coast (technically Claremont zone) only makes it 41%...
Not much better than the Docker aligned Peelmantle tbh!

Beasley Hutton wrote:

BC wrote: we do...during the season we were north of 60% local from memory ....not as good as some but still within the points limitation.

Absolute BS BC you where nowhere near 60%....
8 of the 22 in GF side where Subiaco local zone talent at an appalling 36%...
Even being generous enough to include Stevenson from West Coast (technically Claremont zone) only makes it 41%...not much better than the Docker aligned Peelmantle tbh!

And here I was thinking that all the talk of promoting the talented colts and the premiership winning reserves team was for real:lol:

what part of "during the season" don't you quite get?

Yes, what you meant was Subi give the local kids a run during the year and then drop them for the finals.
Like Greg Clark

Yes...I thought Clark was a bit stiff but fringe players go in and out all the time.

BC wrote: what part of "during the season" don't you quite get?

When?

Goodness me it is actually a helluva lot worse than even I thought possible.
A season high of 10 (45%) local Subiaco zone players played in the 2nd Semi and a low of 5 (23%) local zone players played in Round 4 for a season average of just under 8 (36%) local zone players per game!
A fairly long way from BC's supposed 60%!
Even Peelmantle would have had a better % of locals across the season than Subiaco!
And he has the gall to suggest Swans fans are on drugs!!!

Beasley Hutton wrote: Goodness me it is actually a helluva lot worse than even I thought possible.
A season high of 10 (45%) local Subiaco zone players played in the 2nd Semi and a low of 5 (23%) local zone players played in Round 4 for a season average of just under 8 (36%) local zone players per game!
A fairly long way from BC's supposed 60%!
Even Peelmantle would have had a better % of locals across the season than Subiaco!
And he has the gall to suggest Swans fans are on drugs!!!

That's some pretty alarming statistics there BH, good work. Any chance that the clowns from WAFC could look at a system of minimum number of local talent in each WAFL team for season 2018 as a strategy of equalisation across the league.
It would even have an impact on the alignment clubs looking after their WAFL clubs development zone players...