TOPIC:

Ripper response SS. Really had a chuckle on this bit."So off you go up the Swan valley and find some more sour grapes to suck on."

Theouterseagull wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: SS there were hundreds of $ubi supporters leaving the ground at the same time as me whilst the presentations were on 2-3k still there as you say from the official 13k is laughable it was miniscule. The fact there were $ubi fans leaving early showed to me how little it means to them fair dinkum if that was Swans or Perth or even Freeze's mob we would have jumped the fence to celebrate with the boys. As I have pointed out on another post between $ & C who have the smallest supporter bases by far you have only missed 8 of the last 35 GF's, yeah we know you guys dont care as your mob are dominating but the general WA footy public are bored shitless with the dominance of the 2 near Western Suburb neighbours ...that is a fact that cannot be denied!

And in tonight's news DuckHeads are yet again dribbling shit about crowd numbers, clearly embarrassed and trying to distract from their own failure of a club.

outer...I realize the u and I are next to each other on the key board but think you might have made a mistake.

Mudlark wrote: You are an absolute tosser BH! Go suffer in your jocks! Why didn't you grab the $9 on offer for Subi to win the flag before the season started like I did? The only premiership your mob have won since 1990 was the flag you absolutely bought in 2010. Pretty pathetic and that's a fact you cannot deny!

Jeez mate, dont you know, the entire state revolves around Bassendean, its a wonder subi oval didn't dissappear in a puff of magic bong smoke when both junior grades got smashed in their GFs.

Senior Seagull wrote:

Beasley Hutton wrote: SS there were hundreds of $ubi supporters leaving the ground at the same time as me whilst the presentations were on 2-3k still there as you say from the official 13k is laughable it was miniscule. The fact there were $ubi fans leaving early showed to me how little it means to them fair dinkum if that was Swans or Perth or even Freeze's mob we would have jumped the fence to celebrate with the boys. As I have pointed out on another post between $ & C who have the smallest supporter bases by far you have only missed 8 of the last 35 GF's, yeah we know you guys dont care as your mob are dominating but the general WA footy public are bored shitless with the dominance of the 2 near Western Suburb neighbours ...that is a fact that cannot be denied!

BH you see it as you do through your rabid anti Subiaco eyes and I see it as I do from my pov, we'll agree to disagree while I try and get my 8 yo grand daughter to show me how to get that photo on this site.

And of course your right, they need to change the rules so only SD & P can play in GF's, never mind if they win any games, that surely will be in the games best interests. Maybe if your mob hadn't pissed massive amounts of money up against the wall you would have continued to recruit interstate players like the ones that won you your '10 GF and maybe won a few more. So off you go up the Swan valley and find some more sour grapes to suck on.

SS perhaps the most BASELESS, PATHETIC and PUERILE posting in the history of ozfooty and footygoss.

What is fundamental for the health of the WAFL competition is that at the start of the season each club's supporters have HOPE that their team could make the finals that season. Of the 9, I will be generous, clubs that will play in the 2016 season HOW MANY clubs' supporters have hope that they will make the finals? Especially since three of those four positions will be filled by Subiaco, and the shams of clubs East Perth and Peel.

This will continue eachensuing season and the only variation will be if the Eagles' treat East Perth like the proverbial and take the soul and spirit from the Perth Football Club.

DG wrote: Perth v swans or a derby MAY have got 20 yesterday but I doubt it. Too many things going against it yesterday.

What the fact is the WAFL is hopeless compromised by Subiaco and the host club alignment? The fact that so few neutrals turn up to what was ALWAYS going to be a one-sided contest and everyone knew which team would win? The the WAFL competition is run by a body which in virtually every decision SAVE ONE that makes decisions which FUNDAMENTALLLY and ADVERSELY affects the integrity of the competition? The fact that Channel 7 has treated the WAFL competition with COMPLETE and UTTER contempt in their broadcast times and commentating? etc. etc. etc.

swan42 wrote:

DG wrote: Perth v swans or a derby MAY have got 20 yesterday but I doubt it. Too many things going against it yesterday.

What the fact is the WAFL is hopeless compromised by Subiaco and the host club alignment? The fact that so few neutrals turn up to what was ALWAYS going to be a one-sided contest and everyone knew which team would win? The the WAFL competition is run by a body which in virtually every decision SAVE ONE that makes decisions which FUNDAMENTALLLY and ADVERSELY affects the integrity of the competition? The fact that Channel 7 has treated the WAFL competition with COMPLETE and UTTER contempt in their broadcast times and commentating? etc. etc. etc.

Hey swan did you notice the gf tv coverage had a rating of 81?

DG wrote:

swan42 wrote:

DG wrote: Perth v swans or a derby MAY have got 20 yesterday but I doubt it. Too many things going against it yesterday.

What the fact is the WAFL is hopeless compromised by Subiaco and the host club alignment? The fact that so few neutrals turn up to what was ALWAYS going to be a one-sided contest and everyone knew which team would win? The the WAFL competition is run by a body which in virtually every decision SAVE ONE that makes decisions which FUNDAMENTALLLY and ADVERSELY affects the integrity of the competition? The fact that Channel 7 has treated the WAFL competition with COMPLETE and UTTER contempt in their broadcast times and commentating? etc. etc. etc.

Hey swan did you notice the gf tv coverage had a rating of 81?

No. Further what does 81 mean? 13,000 for the GF: pathetic. I suppose it was TOO HOT this year? I can't wait to hear of G Walton's rationalisation as to the reasons why there was such a poor attendance this year. Maybe it was because there was a "Red Moon'?