TOPIC:

thefalconstrike wrote: No because the logo will not be coming off the jumper period! & nor should it because wp have a contract with 9 to promote it. Then when wp make the gf they can give out 20000 channel 9 hats for the wp fans to wear to the game!

Did you see the ch 9 news last night, the orginal logo was removed...lol

Bazza wrote: 6PR rumour file said a few days ago that WPFC had ordered new jumpers from Burley Sekem, this ties in with the timeline that they were served with the breach notice from the WAFC, while Raponi was putting up his usual BS about how he was right and the WAFC was wrong he was ordering new jumpers on the quiet to comply with the WAFC.

This was clearly a spot on rumour as WPFC were desprately preparing a way out with new jumpers and logos at the same time - Ch 9 showed the first proposed revised logo on the jumper last night which was REJECTED by the WAFC, WPFC walked off with tails between their legs amd will come back with a proposal that is suitable to the WAFC NOT to Raponi or the WPFC.

The WPFC have ZERO support from any of the other WAFL Clubs. becuase they have complied with the licence rules and WPFC have gone outside of them.

If the broadcast of the GF is canned whoever they play, say Subiaco or East Perth will hit WPFC for damages for the loss of coverage for their own sponsors during a live broadcast of the GF Statewide, on COMMERCIAL TV.

Plus they face WAFC fines for breach of licence.

they have no hope of winning a ROT case, which Raponi knows.

Raponi better start being more honest as he is looking more and more exposed by the day.

Full of shit Bazza, hit for damages

Bazza wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: name another WAFL sponsor from a G7 club who has been mentioned at least once a week in the West in relation to the WAFL since the start of the season.
the only one is ch9 and its in a newspaper of their direct competition.
do more people watch the wafl on tv or read the sports section of the West ?

name another WAFL club that has come out in support of Raponi WPFC or the Ch 9 deal in the last 48 hours?

Whats the last 48 hrs got to do with anything? Peter Hodyl for one personally rang Brett after we played them up at Joondy a few weeks back telling him SD were firmly behind WP..Now isn't that enough for you? Your like a copper trying to fit someone up because he knows he is wrong! Maybe you have some experience in that..

Bazza wrote:

Wals Dog wrote:

Bazza wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: Hah, yeh the WAFC has the upper hand here, that has clearly be shown over the last 6 months whilst ch9 have been getting more mentions in the West than they could ever have hoped for.
WP and 9 have played the WAFC for the fools they are

Absolute crap, Raponi has fucked this all up and been has been bull shiting all along, the result is he has not had his team on TV all season , and is now backing down changing jumpers.

and morons like you got sucked in by it, saying WP would not back down blah blah blah.

Ch 9 has got fuck all out of this. 300k and not on TV once. LOL.

Channel 9 has got fuck all out of this???

They have received more exposure out of this deal than any other WAFL Club Sponsor, it's been front and centre on all WAFL related media and even made headlines in other states.

Put up a survey and list all WAFL clubs and see how many people can name the major sponsors. Guarantee who tops that list.

But yeah, Channel 9 have gotten SFA out of this..

Except one live telecast game for the whole season lol

Ch 7 news is still dominating ratings champ,

Your one dead set dumb shit Bazza, it is as obvious as the nose on your face that the WAFC are the ones that are shitting themselves, they had a crack at WP or threatened is the better word on the following that came up with zero affect.

1.Pulled coverage on WP games (big deal).
2.Threatened to kick us out of the Finals which was baseless and could not be done.
3.Threatened to take home Final off us, baseless once again.
4.Threatening to sue the club as we are in breach (failed once again as we are not in breach).
5.Threatening to take a slice of the allocation money the WAFL clubs get (rear guard on point 4)
6.Now they are back to not televising the Prelim or GF (if we make it), big deal.

I could go on.............................

Dumb LOL you win that one ............obvious oh really???

Then why is WPFC running around at the last minute.

You have to hand it to Raponi, sending tweets out about how he will not bend and the WAFC is wrong..while on the other ringing Burley Sekem on the hush hush ordering new jumpers.

talk about dumb,,,and you get sucked in by it.

1.Pulled coverage on WP games (big deal). Yes that happened , a big deal for your mob.
2.Threatened to kick us out of the Finals which was baseless and could not be done. They never said that would happen for certain , and have stated they would not do it.
3.Threatened to take home Final off us, baseless once again. ditto
4.Threatening to sue the club as we are in breach (failed once again as we are not in breach). No wrong again they never said they would sue anyone said they would face fines which they still stand by.
5.Threatening to take a slice of the allocation money the WAFL clubs get (rear guard on point 4) That is still possible.,
6.Now they are back to not televising the Prelim or GF (if we make it), big deal. Yep, and the reprucussions that follow,

Swandog wrote:

Bazza wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: name another WAFL sponsor from a G7 club who has been mentioned at least once a week in the West in relation to the WAFL since the start of the season.
the only one is ch9 and its in a newspaper of their direct competition.
do more people watch the wafl on tv or read the sports section of the West ?

name another WAFL club that has come out in support of Raponi WPFC or the Ch 9 deal in the last 48 hours?

Whats the last 48 hrs got to do with anything? Peter Hodyl for one personally rang Brett after we played them up at Joondy a few weeks back telling him SD were firmly behind WP..Now isn't that enough for you? Your like a copper trying to fit someone up because he knows he is wrong! Maybe you have some experience in that..

How dumb are you moron

that was weeks ago, the entire thing has moved on since then, the entire facts are now evident to the other clubs,,,and what is Swans doing and saying now

after the last briefing it was publicly announced that ALL clubs stood with the WAFC on this issue...that is why the last 48 hours is imprtant becuase not a single club has come out and and denied it.

NOT A SINGLE ONE including SDFC...what part of that dont you get.

its Wednesday before the 2nd semi - situation still not resolved.
great work WAFC, any chance Bazza you can lend your hand to the WAFC - you would have had this sorted out in March by the sounds as you have all the answers yet i still havnt read of any resolution ?.

MarkOlsen wrote: its Wednesday before the 2nd semi - situation still not resolved.
great work WAFC, any chance Bazza you can lend your hand to the WAFC - you would have had this sorted out in March by the sounds as you have all the answers yet i still havnt read of any resolution ?.

balls in Raponis court my friend, he has been the one holding things up all along, WAFC have not changed their stance, but in the last 48 hrs or so WPFC are very suddenly changing theirs. From refusing to remove the logo to removing it and placing a smaller one on, which has also been been rejected, Raponi your call.,,keep the tweets up..lol

Bazza wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: Hah, yeh the WAFC has the upper hand here, that has clearly be shown over the last 6 months whilst ch9 have been getting more mentions in the West than they could ever have hoped for.
WP and 9 have played the WAFC for the fools they are

Absolute crap, Raponi has fucked this all up and been has been bull shiting all along, the result is he has not had his team on TV all season , and is now backing down changing jumpers.

and morons like you got sucked in by it, saying WP would not back down blah blah blah.

Ch 9 has got fuck all out of this. 300k and not on TV once. LOL.

You are so dillusionally wrong. Channel 9 would be smirking like the chesire cat over this

Bazza wrote:

MarkOlsen wrote: its Wednesday before the 2nd semi - situation still not resolved.
great work WAFC, any chance Bazza you can lend your hand to the WAFC - you would have had this sorted out in March by the sounds as you have all the answers yet i still havnt read of any resolution ?.

balls in Raponis court my friend, he has been the one holding things up all along, WAFC have not changed their stance, but in the last 48 hrs or so WPFC are very suddenly changing theirs. From refusing to remove the logo to removing it and placing a smaller one on, which has also been been rejected, Raponi your call.,,keep the tweets up..lol

right, so the governing body's failure to sort this out over the last 6 months hasnt held things up ?
ok then..