TOPIC:

The big difference Freez is that none of the one's you mentioned were contracted to their original clubs....sure they defaulted back to their club of origin when delisted but none had a legal and binding contract as Leggett does.

Do you Perth boys know for a fact the offer has been 10k and players?

I would think EF would need to come to the party transfer wise. Who knows what that is. As Freezin mentioned, Perth May have asked, or even spoke to, EF players but they didn’t want to make the move.

I think now it’s all out in the open, a deal will get done. If Leggett did try to leave last year, I’d say there’s more issues than just where he plays.

KCEF wrote: Do you Perth boys know for a fact the offer has been 10k and players?

I would think EF would need to come to the party transfer wise. Who knows what that is. As Freezin mentioned, Perth May have asked, or even spoke to, EF players but they didn’t want to make the move.
I think now it’s all out in the open, a deal will get done. If Leggett did try to leave last year, I’d say there’s more issues than just where he plays.

Let us have your conspiracy theory then KC. If the issues be known you may not want him.

I don’t know- but it seems odd he’s tried to leave twice

In my opinion it’s pretty simple. He’s contracted so unless EF offer up something of value to PFC then Cody remains a Demon.
For those that say release him and you don’t want someone on the list who wants out, perhaps Daniher and Papley at AFL level are good precedents.
I hardly think playing for Perth has hampered his AFL aspirations, plenty of others have been recruited in time he had been playing. Contracted, play out your contract and impress. Sooking and standing out for a year won’t impress any recruiters.
Feels like there is a superior $$$ deal on the table driving this - ‘playing a different’ role’ is pretty lightweight reason and not believable.

what is he on? they need to pay out his contract at the very least.

Classic Perth. Keeping a player that has tried to move twice. Great for your culture.

what would be even worse for the club would be to let a contracted player go -- Subi never let Buckernara go I wonder why that was?

I assume the WAFL has an arbitration process?

ArkRoyal wrote: what would be even worse for the club would be to let a contracted player go -- Subi never let Buckernara go I wonder why that was?

I assume the WAFL has an arbitration process?

Happens all the time. All the mid year signings are under contract- how did Simpson end up at EP? Tropiano at Perth?

kcef: yes, that is true, but the point your missing, is that on those occasions both sides had eventually agreed.

We eventually let Buckenara go too, but not for nowt.