TOPIC:

30 plus I'm going to presume that you are talking about Noble who played at Trinity. I will also presume that the ex player was DOS. Would I be close to the money?

G'day Grassy.
Yeah went along for a look.
Kids showed some promise, however not enough class players around them.
Yeah 30+ is due for a name change.

Swedgen wrote: G'day Grassy.
Yeah went along for a look.
Kids showed some promise, however not enough class players around them.
Yeah 30+ is due for a name change.

Yep 40 plus for sure,I can see that turning into 50 plus,sadly.

Country member wrote: Five goals from Stack. Ressies next week.

HAAhaha said the same thing when he kicked his last goal.

Mr AFL wrote: Well what can you say about yesterday's game apart from the fact it was terrible. I know we are a young side but yesterday they went away from the positive things they had done in the opening two rounds and went backwards.

At times in the first half yesterday I thought we mucked around with the ball far to much all over the ground. I think we should have kicked at least two or three more goals in our forward 50 but didn't because we p**s farted around with it.

I said it earlier in the week that Stacky was a player that makes the most of his limited chances. Six disposals but he kicked 5 goals.

Was good to see Spencer White kick four goals but I'd like to see him crash the packs more and assert himself.

Full credit to Claremont though. If they keep playing like that then I reckon they will finish in the top two.

Great comeback win by the reserves. Wouldn't mind seeing Tim Sutherland, Marshall Jones and Julian Jacobs come into the league team next week. All big bodies which I think will help. Hopefully provide that bit of mongrel we have been missing.

I know I will cop a bit of SHit for this but, I would rather see Jacobs stay out of the league team. Yes he gets the ball a lot but his turn over rate is ridiculously high. To me he is a list blocker. Don't get me wrong he is a nice bloke runs hard and has heart, but the time after time he runs himself into trouble or is disposal causes opposition scoring opportunities.

There could be one or two others before you consider Jacobs to be a list blocker PD IMO

smokey wrote: There could be one or two others before you consider Jacobs to be a list blocker PD IMO

Yes, I will agree with that.

PD1899 will agree that at times his disposal does let him down but he is hardly alone there.

I'd have him in the team due to his bigger body at the contests and the fact that you know he is going to give it 200% and leave no stone unturned come game day.

Without doubt he is a walk up first 22 player.

Jacobs is a vital in for us we've got so many skinny kids out there they will benefit from his bigger body and running endurance.